![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I prefer LSMFT.
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]()
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I used to work with an editor who would say, "No point in flagellating a moribund ungulate."
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going to need Barry Arnold to translate that for me.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes it behooves you to do so.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
it's PSA without a doubt, because
they seem to ignore large black (or maybe dark blue) spots in the background. ![]() All grading algorithms are flawed and all graders are human regardless of which hat they are wearing. PS - This beauty could be yours. ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In their defense the corners are pretty sharp.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Successful transactions with the-illini, Kawika, irishdenny, iwantitiwinit, AddieJoss. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everyone on this board has 100% agreed that PSA is the best. There is no controversy whatsoever.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Try a google search. SGC vs. PSA net 54. Enjoy.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That would be Loose Straps Mean Floppy TaTa's - Right?
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 220/520 : 42% |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"The weak prices across the board for SGC are out there because of the card in the holder."
I'd suggest you stop buying SGC 5's and trying to cross them if that's the case.... Each company has their own grading criteria. PSA "4" cards often seem to have a small crease and I've found paper missing on the backs. SGC seems to allow for more corner wear - sometimes their VG cards are more like good. I'm in the SGC camp and I have ungraded cards as well. Vanilla, chocolate, moose tracks - there are many ways to collect. Most of the time both do a decent job. Some of the time they do a really bad job. Align yourself in either camp or neither - sometimes your unyielding blanket statements relative to quality control and pricing just doesn't stand up to the facts. If you bought a card on it's own merits and not based on what some third party said - in the long run you would likely be less disappointed..... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I align with corners being more important, and probably does most of the rest of the world. That is a great talking point in of itself. If you had to stack all aspects up, corners, cleanliness, centering etc. I'm willing to bet corners are the most important to the majority of people. Prewar only people, sure, maybe not so much. I have only ever seen three 4s with a crease in my time. The only reason they were 4s with a crease is because every other aspect of the cards were above a 4. Based on grading standard it was the minimum grade that could be given. Missing paper on a PSA 4? What world is that comment from? How many examples can you back that up with, 1, 2, a handful of them amongst the several thousand? Kevin Last edited by thehoodedcoder; 05-03-2014 at 12:30 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Corners mean little/nothing to me. Cleanliness and size. Many times sharp corners=small card.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Now I will sit back and watch the fireworks begin. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC is more forgiving on corner wear. PSA is more forgiving on minor wrinkles and marks and spots of paper loss (or they miss them more frequently). I have questions about the purity of both companies for different reasons; hope I am wrong but have seen an awful lot that doesn't make sense.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Smartest comment made in this thread yet!! Agreed!!
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you want to get a nicely trimmed card graded then send it to PSA. That's why I choose SGC for my personal cards.
Justin |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Breaking News; Stevie Wonder gets hired by the PSA Grading Co.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1915-Cracker...item5affb9e9d8 I don't know what's sadder; the grade or the fact the guy wants $425 for it .... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I prefer CSA.......they've done studies you know, 60% of the time they get it right every time
![]() ![]() |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-08-2014 at 10:37 AM. |
![]() |
|
|