Opinions on post war HoF rookie set

[ALR-bishop]

Yes, if you want to

[Vintageloz]

My opinion, no. If the registry says it's part of the set, I think you gotta have it. If you get two, I can use one as well

[cdn_collector]

Simple answer: Yep, you can stop here and call it complete.

Simple question: Can you go with a non-Leaf rookie card? A 1939-46 Exhibit, for example?


Richard.

[bcbgcbrcb]

No, not complete without it. I won't rest until it's done.............

[HRBAKER]

Well if the registry says you have to have it - then that settles it, right?

[MattyC]

Never let a website tell you how to collect. And above all, never let a website manipulate you into buying a card you don't want.

[Sean1125]

Originally Posted by MattyC

Never let a website tell you how to collect. And above all, never let a website manipulate you into buying a card you don't want.

[ALR-bishop]

Anyone read the book Needful Things ? A baseball card is involved

[brewing]

Originally Posted by cdn_collector

Simple answer: Yep, you can stop here and call it complete.



Simple question: Can you go with a non-Leaf rookie card? A 1939-46 Exhibit, for example?





Richard.

My definition of a rookie card is a national release of a player as a MLB player, so that excludes other releases. Exhibit's? I consider them postcards, others may like them, but they're not for me.

I'm liking your answer of calling it complete.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[cdn_collector]

Originally Posted by brewing

I'm liking your answer of calling it complete.

Then call it complete.
If you're still not sure, don't call it anything. You can always keep it "in progress" while you pursue other things and decide later.

Cheers,

Richard.