 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
04-28-2014, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I think some/most of the low priced/valued rarities are so low priced/valued is because of their rarity.
T206's are common but some of the backs are really hard to find. However, because so many T206's were made and still in existence, it gives people hope when they start going after a certain back that either 1) given enough time and money they can find and acquire a number of them or 2) more will come out of the woodwork. That is not true with a number of sets. The cards are so rare and don't come up very often that people don't get interested in them because they think they have no shot at completion no matter how much time or money they have. David 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 11:54 AM |
| LOWEST PRICE EVER PER VCP - MUST SELL: 1921 Exhibits Burleigh Grimes HOF RC PSA 6 | CharleyBrown | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 12-10-2011 08:38 AM |
| Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 04:12 PM |
| 1955 topps #176 Norm Zauchin PSA 8 2nd lowest pop in the set | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-19-2009 09:04 AM |
| Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 11:13 AM |
Threaded Mode