![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If REA results are a measure of the state of the hobby, the hobby looks to be in pretty good shape, especially the scarce Old Judge portion of it.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think we can aggregate so many unique, individual results and determine if there's disappointment or not hobby wide. Each lot is its own. Each card is its own. Some blow away others in their grade, like that beautiful Croft Cobb or the D304 Cobb or the e90-2 Wags, to name a few. These will likely sell strong as compared to historical prices for their grade. Other epic icons like that Ruth RC and Cobb Back did amazingly. Conversely, a card with weak attributes as compared to others in its grade will sell for less. So personally I am all about each card/lot as a discrete event.
Last edited by MattyC; 04-27-2014 at 12:51 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't follow 19th century cards too much, but did the Deacon White portrait card misidentified as McGreachery, Mgr sell for around the price you expected? Tony |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also, there's a big issue in discussions like this that involve expectations. Each collector has his own expectations based on his own knowledge, experience, taste, desire, etc. It's impossible to define a hobby wide standard expectation. Many different collectors will value the same card very differently. So to one a card might over perform, to another that same card might be a disappointment.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tony--it exceeded my expectations. Having said that, the card really had no price history for comparison.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As usual, Leon, you and I are on the same wavelength. I think on a very basic level that if multiple cards are being sold for six digits and up, that shows that the hobby is healthy. Does that mean that 70s and 80s cards or a low pop 1960's common will shatter historical prices when next offered? Of course not.
Ultimately though, a card can sell for X amount of dollars... "Collector A" can say to himself, "What a steal! Wish I bid higher!" "Collector B" can say, "I can't believe someone paid that much for that!" "Collector C" of stamps, can say, "I wouldn't pay a penny for any card; they're all worthless to me." Everybody has their own expectations and valuations. One man's trash is another man's treasure. I've never called girls back who are wives today. Bottom line, all it ever takes is two who agree, to make something worth a great amount. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed, and it all depends on the item. If it was just two guys that drove it initially and no one new has decided to pursue the item in the intervening years, then yes, that could be a problem. But that dreaded scenario is specific to the case of two bidders and only those two interested parties all the way until resale. I'd venture that more often than not, with time, and with high-end items that are desirable to many, there will always be at least two to tango and make sure the price stays in the ballpark. The resale scenario also brings into account one's expectations. Some guys take the loss of even a dollar as a debacle. Others think breaking even is a triumph, when they have gotten such joy out of owning a cherished piece. So there are a lot of variables in play.
Last edited by MattyC; 04-27-2014 at 03:26 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
when I made a quick calculation REA was making nearly 3,000. a minute in fees and recieving 15+ bids a minute in that time frame. The hobby seems pretty solid :-)
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It certainly tells us something about the hobby, and prices do seem to be incredibly strong. Since REA generally deals in high end expensive lots, it doesn't tell us much about the meat and potatoes mainstream stuff. But it would be hard to walk away with any impression other than people with a lot of money are happy to spend it on quality baseball cards.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implications of "cleaning up the hobby?" | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 10-17-2013 06:44 AM |
Announcing "Collectors Forensics Register" - Revolutionizing the Hobby | Collectors Forensics Reg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 98 | 11-12-2010 03:12 PM |
New York State League "Jags" - UPDATE | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-30-2008 06:35 PM |
My two cents about the board and the "hobby". | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-09-2007 05:52 PM |
Did he state "nice centering"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-29-2006 10:16 AM |