![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have come to believe if one had the inclination to search endlessly one might eventually find a print difference in every card.
![]() There is a discussion of print lines or errant lines in the 1970s thread on here. I have examples of them in quite a few of my sets. Missing ink or too much ink are other defects that occur quite a bit, some are pretty dramatic. I have been debating whether to keep accumulating recurring print differences that do not seem intentional, or maybe limit acquisitions to those that I think might gain hobby recognition at some point . But the 61 Fairly shows that to be a hap hazard guessing game at best. ![]() Great detective work, Joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another odd variation -
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps high numbers | robsbessette | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 12-20-2013 05:50 PM |
1966 Topps High #s SOLD | robsbessette | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 11-24-2013 09:01 AM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
WTB: 1966 topps high nos wanted in VG | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-18-2008 09:09 AM |
wtb - 1953 Topps back print variations | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-26-2007 09:12 AM |