More T206 Sheet Madness

[ZachS]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

I always enjoy reading board member research. Thanks for sharing!

Every time I read these threads this is how I feel:

[t206hound]

I've been looking at various uncut sheets from various products over time, and cannot find an instance where a player appears more than three times on a sheet. This makes sense to me... why keep making stones/plates when I can just print more sheets.

We've never seen same player/pose horizontally. We know based on (double name) miscuts that there are MANY instances of players stacked vertically. There are (apparently) fewer instances of two name miscuts that show different players stacked vertically. There are definitely more instances of double name miscuts than two name miscuts.

I want to believe that in most cases there were no more than two instances of a card on a sheet, but the ratio of double name to two name cards seem to indicate that most cards probably occurred three times. I cannot imagine a fourth instance of a card on a sheet.

What's the opinion/consensus here?

[steve B]

At least for P150 the number is closer to 8 of the same card on a sheet. Possibly without stacking. I've only looked closely at one card, and sort of looked at a couple others as a sort of test before I get into a huge project.

Steve B

[atx840]

Erick, both are BB's so not sure which back they would have had...doubt from same sheet but Oakes has Hoblitzell red ink shift.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by atx840

Erick, both are BB's so not sure which back they would have had...doubt from same sheet but Oakes has Hoblitzell red ink shift.

What a find!

[mrvster]

love both of those BB's