Mystery Solved - Pinpointing the dates of W590 cards - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:09 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 36,332
Default

Here is a better scan of the W590 sheet. It looks like at least the bottom is trimmed and maybe more.

__________________
Leon Luckey
www.luckeycards.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2015, 05:56 PM
glchen's Avatar
glchen glchen is offline
_G@ґy*€hℯη_
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,005
Default

I've been behind on this thread, so have wanted to update it in a while. First, a long, long time ago when this thread was still active, a board member pointed out that I had two of the W590 Cobbs where the fonts looked different. Therefore, I scanned them both on the same scanner side by side. The scan shows the font differences between the two (type 2 vs type 1) although it's not as easy to see in person. However, if you know about the font theory then you can see the differences.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg w590_cobbs_closer.jpg (76.6 KB, 648 views)

Last edited by glchen; 07-24-2015 at 05:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2015, 06:06 PM
glchen's Avatar
glchen glchen is offline
_G@ґy*€hℯη_
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,005
Default

Next thing to show are two Ross Youngs, which look like Type 1 and Type 3 according to the font theory, with the Type 3 being of the "Former" position variation for the card. The thing to see here is on the far left is the number "15" (cut off on one of the cards). This seems to show that this card was the first card on the 15th row of the sheet / page that this card was issued. Since both cards are on the same row / position, this supports the theory that new players / cards were not added to the set. Instead, for each year the set was issued, only the player's team or position was updated as needed. Therefore, each year should have the same number of player cards.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1925_w590_youngs.jpg (76.9 KB, 648 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2015, 06:17 PM
glchen's Avatar
glchen glchen is offline
_G@ґy*€hℯη_
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,005
Default

Finally, two new position / team variations have been uncovered, so I have added these to the checklist in post #2. They are:

Max Carey with the new position as Coach
Bob Meusel with the new team as Cincinnati

Note that the Carey should be a Type 3 according to the font theory, but the boldness and typeface are closer to Type 1.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg new_w590.jpg (40.7 KB, 646 views)

Last edited by glchen; 07-24-2015 at 11:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2015, 07:25 PM
paul's Avatar
paul paul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,520
Default

That Max Carey seems to really undermine the font theory.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2015, 02:08 PM
vintagehofrookies vintagehofrookies is offline
Dan McHugh IV
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Madison, CT
Posts: 731
Default

if one of those Cobbs was from 1931 wouldn't it say "former" or his last team which would be the A's?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2015, 05:28 PM
glchen's Avatar
glchen glchen is offline
_G@ґy*€hℯη_
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagehofrookies View Post
if one of those Cobbs was from 1931 wouldn't it say "former" or his last team which would be the A's?
According to the font theory since both the player and team name are in bold, the year of issue should be around 1928/29. Therefore, there wouldn't be "former" on the card, but the team name should theoretically have changed to Philadelphia A.L. rather than continue to stay with Detroit.

Unfortunately, the one of the many things that we don't know with the set is how consistent the issuers were with correcting the team and name changes. Did they simply forget to make the changes for Cobb or is the bold/bold part of the font theory disproven? Unfortunately, all of the uncut strips and panels that we have seen so far are from the 1925 year. If we could see a 1931 uncut strip, that might greatly help in dating these cards. Also, if Ty Cobb cards with his team as Philadelphia and with "Former" do appear, then we would probably need to re-assess this part of the font theory. However, the 1931 cards are extremely rare, which is why two new variations to this set were just added in the last year. It's tough to say if and when they would come out. The other thing that has not yet been proven is whether all of the same players that were issued in 1925 were also remained in 1931. For example, for the players that retired, we have seen that "Former" is now added to the card. However, we have not seen all of the players that retired having "Former" cards yet. (e.g., Ty Cobb, Walter Johnson, etc) Therefore, it is still possible that for these retired players, they did not have "Former" added to their card or their card in the set was swapped out with another player (e.g., a Roy Spencer).

Last edited by glchen; 07-29-2015 at 05:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E90-1 Series Mystery solved? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 39 10-08-2008 02:00 PM
Another T206 Ghost Print Mystery Solved Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 01-19-2008 09:48 AM
WG2: mystery solved, set for sale Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 11-14-2006 12:47 AM
95 yr old mystery solved - Nadja origins Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 04-15-2006 04:57 PM
Jim Thorpe card mystery solved!!! Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 03-30-2006 12:57 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.


ebay GSB