![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Opt out of mc and mk qualifiers.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() According to an email I recently got from PSA you can opt out of MC. I have a severely miscut card and wanted to know what the highest grade it could possibly get if it had the qualifier. Here is the answer: Quote:
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
new policy, but just because a customer service person tells you something at PSA do not take it to the bank. They often do not truly know policy. My information comes directly from a conversation with Joe Orlando from about 3 years ago. I assume he knows/knew the policy correctly. The reasoning is the MC is outside the parameters for centering to receive even a 1 which i believe needs to be 90-10. I don't have the standards in front of me.
Last edited by glynparson; 03-31-2014 at 04:49 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about T206 miscuts | Rob D. | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-12-2014 07:55 PM |
Grading Question | Harliduck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 26 | 01-10-2014 08:45 AM |
Re-grading question | ubiqty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-25-2013 01:50 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-16-2002 04:39 AM |