|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think 'vintage' should necessarily have the same 'pre-war' date split that is recognized over on the card side. Bowman and Topps came along right after wwii, so that split was natural. To me, the vintage split with game-used should be set at around the time that it all became commercialized - probably at some point in the 1980's, around the time that baseball cards became almost uncollectible due to speculation (1988?). Am I right about this? Or was it earlier for game-used?
Also, I'm not asking for a forum split or new sub-forums. This was really just a simple question about having two 'threads' - threads are not really a big deal. Hindsight tells me I should have just done it, and if no one responded to the 'vintage' pick-ups thread, I would have had my answer. I LOVE my game-used stuff!!! Look below - I'm a good guy with an open mind ![]()
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modern shiny stuff v. Vintage Pre War | YankeeCollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-28-2011 08:10 AM |
| Rant on modern with vintage desigins | HOF Yankees | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 03-26-2011 01:00 PM |
| Graded vintage to modern FS on Ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 09-21-2007 11:07 AM |
| Goudey Vintage and Modern on E-bay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 01-25-2007 06:18 AM |
| Vintage vs Modern Printing Techniques | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-19-2002 02:14 AM |