 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-19-2014, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
A very good friend of mine had a 1955 Killebrew Rookie. It looked gemmy to my naked eye, I did not loop it.
1st submission: VG-EX 4 2nd submission: EX 5 3rd submission: Authentic evidence of trimming 4th submission: MINT 9 I begged him to submit it just 1 more time but he wouldn't  You have to remember that with some large companies you will have different graders looking at your card and as someone pointed out in 1 of the threads, we are all human and not perfect. 
|
|
#2
03-19-2014, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
03-19-2014, 12:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That is scary
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HELP! Opinion needed on grading comparison | quinnsryche | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 12-05-2010 12:07 PM |
| What is Your Opinion About Grading? | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 05-24-2010 10:09 AM |
| Grading opinion please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-16-2006 06:37 PM |
| Grading opinion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-28-2006 07:28 AM |
| Are SCD still grading cards? Board opinion? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-21-2005 07:52 PM |
Hybrid Mode
