![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If pas gave negative grades, my collection would probably fall into that category.
Having said that, I don't really bother with grading. Not that I have anything against it, but when creased, tears, trimming, holes, writing and stains are pretty much pre-requisites for cards to enter your collection, you find that technical grades are the furthest thing from your mind. Hell, in my case, it doesn't even have to be a complete card, and often that's even preferred. For financial reasons, of course. Last edited by novakjr; 02-28-2014 at 08:52 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA meaning Prostate-Specific Antigen can be a marker for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. A low PSA number is desirable, preferably less than 1.
Hope this helps. ![]() Doc
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Successful transactions with the-illini, Kawika, irishdenny, iwantitiwinit, AddieJoss. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You'd probably get better responses if you asked "Which condition range do you prefer to collect?" or something to that effect. I think most people on here have a general condition range that they mostly stick to, for a combination of aesthetic and monetary reasons. Your question (whether intentional or not) makes it sounds like you are more concerned about the type of case the card is in, and the number on the card, than the card itself.
My set is being built mostly raw, and in the FAIR to VG range.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray,
I personally collect T206 HOFers in PSA grade 4 only. I've occasionally purchased 4s in other TPG holders for tougher backs, but did cross each over to PSA. I'm sure some board members would cringe at the thought or find it silly, but hey...whatever works for you, right? You'll notice most of my BST sales fall into that category. I do this for three reasons. First, I'm highly obsessive about organization and things being uniform. From work, to home, and now to card collecting. Having every card in the same grade is attractive to me. Whatever the reason, it is satisfying for me and makes collecting enjoyable...for me. Second, it helps me pace myself in the hunt. If I have a smaller potential set of possible cards out there on the market that fit what I'm collecting, it makes the daily hunt a little more fun, much more challenging...and ultimately takes more time and spreads the bankroll out. Especially since I've started accumulating different backs, it's often months between acquisitions. When I started a few years ago, I was blowing out my "card allowance" literally in minutes each month because there are so many out there. Third, I'm relatively new to the pre-war world. When I first started, I was buying all T206 and 1933 Goudey in different TPG grades and raw. Coming right in as a new collector and trying to keep all different TPG grades price scales across multiple sets and then throw in raw cards on top of it was simply too much. I found myself making mistakes and also missing out on good deals at times. Focusing on a small group of cards, within a certain set, within a certain grade has really helped me get a hang of the pricing market, making it more of a hobby and less of a job. The great part about collecting is YOU define YOUR set, and there's tens of thousands of possible ways to go at it. Last edited by bundy462; 02-28-2014 at 09:13 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I thought it was pretty obvious what the guy was asking. I collect 5+ condition because that pretty much sums up what I am looking for in my collection. Looking for complete corners, nice centering and focus. I have had to pass on some 5s because they were really 4s with a gnawed on corner and I have some 5s that could be 7s. Kevin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hahaha. What's better than giant pumpkins and baseball cards
![]() Leon - we need a message board category for giant pumpkins. Hahaha. Just kidding |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have a set grade. I buy the most affordable copy I can find of anything I am looking for. If I have a choice between two in similar price ranges, I will go for the more attractive of the two. The common cards in my collection, if graded, would probably average a PSA 1-1.5 The rarer cards in the collection are probably closer to a 4. When the card rarely comes up for sale, I don't mind spending the extra to get it.
I have never sent a card in for grading. I think it would be nice to have everything in slabs, and all from the same company, but it would be an expensive endeavor to send them all in plus it would take a lot more space to store the collection that I just don't have. I don't collect t206 per se though. I think I have maybe 3 or 4. The only one that is in a holder is an SGC Authentic. It is really moldy, and I cannot tell you how happy that it is sealed up in that holder for my protection and those around me.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's your Monster number? | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2456 | 12-06-2022 02:52 PM |
What's your Collection number? | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 07-22-2013 10:36 AM |
Going for Number 29 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 07-30-2008 12:58 AM |
Item Number | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-28-2003 03:47 PM |
Number 4 ! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-13-2001 08:28 PM |