![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are examples of what is being discussed, both 93 and 94
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming this is the one you're talking about....
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1994-Topps-B...p2047675.l2557 Sure the photo's aren't great, BUT without a doubt I can see the corner damage you're talking about. The bottom right corner looks horrible, the top right not so hot itself(but not awful), the 2 left corners look decent. Don't be mad at me here, BUT given how fairly obvious the damages are in the photos, I might side with the seller here. Forget about his stating "great condition", you had the photos to make that judgement yourself. Now I don't know if you made the purchase on your phone or computer. So I'm just throwing this out there blindly. I can understand missing the damage if you maybe made the purchase using your phone where you didn't get a great view, BUT if you're making a purchase of that price, or on a card claimed to be this rare, you should probably make sure you get the best possible view you can on your computer.. And looking from my comp, the damage, again, is obvious.. I don't envy your situation. But I completely get where the seller's coming from here. I wouldn't offer a partial either in this case, because the condition was clearly evident in the photos... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, as a seller, I can't say that. If I missed the condition like that, I would try to make it right to the buyer within reason.
Also, as a seller, I would have disclosed the condition and not had the buyer rely on grainy digital pictures. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With the seller requesting a full refund or you keep the card at the offer. I do not think he was incredibly reputable but neither is negotiating after purchase in my opinion. Had this arrangement been worked out as a stipulation of purchase I may feel different.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My opinion comes from the fact that this was a BIN with best offer accepted. It is possible that the Seller had a minimum that he would let the card go for. Giving a partial refund could put it below the accepted amount he would have let it go for had you made that offer to start with. Because of this I think the seller shouldn't feel obliged to now make up the difference.
Had it been a .99 cent starting bid auction and the bidding got that high, I could see that maybe he could do a partial refund since the card could have been had at a lower price had other bidders noticed the condition of the card also.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Worst case scenario....get a divorce and wife gets half your collection? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 03-10-2007 09:27 AM |
Scenario~Your Opinions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 84 | 06-08-2005 05:11 PM |