Why there is a pencil outline on Ruth?-1932 photo

[Gary Dunaier]

Originally Posted by Yi

Is this good to the value of the photo or bad?

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

In most cases it does not add value, but if tastefully done (as in this case), is not a big detractor.

Originally Posted by ethicsprof

I actually appreciate seeing this on the photos as it helps elucidate the process of photo editing by the presses,etc.

I agree with both of these comments. But for me, if I was in the market for a certain photograph, I would not want any editing marks on it. I'd be buying it for the image, and in that context the marks, no matter how tastefully done, would be a deal-breaker.

Again, that's just me. Take it with however many grains of salt as you wish.

[drcy]

I agree with all three statements (including Gary's). I prefer no markings, but an unobtrusive or minor marking is okay and shows the photo was used for publication-- which many think is neat. It all depends on how the aesthetics, which of course is a matter of personal taste.