Minor, minor, minor 1962 variation

[savedfrommyspokes]

Good find Darren, I have not noticed this one before.

[ALR-bishop]

Me either. I tend to collect recurring print defects in older sets. Someone in a fairly recent earlier thread pointed out a similar recurring line defect in a 60s pitching leader card, I think involving Koufax. It too was scarce but fairly easy to locate on ebay. Nice find Darren ( yeah, I nailed it)

[steve B]

Most likely a scratched plate. Interesting, at least to me. It looks like it goes off the bottom border, so there should be a card with the scratch showing at the top right.

The location of the black in the panel could be a slight difference, or simply that batch having the black printed a bit out of register.

Plate scratches in general aren't all that common, once the plate is damaged it's often replaced.


Steve B

[ALR-bishop]

If they replaced a plate to correct a defect, then in my mind it would be a variation. But on most recurring print defects I assume we will never know if an intentional change was made. But I do like to collect them if recurring.

I guess if PSA believes the green smudged ball on the back of the 61 Fairly is a variation, almost anything could conceivably be so classified by chance or whim of grading companies.

Wonder if any of the other kids in the photo lived to collect that card

[rsdill2]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

If they replaced a plate to correct a defect, then in my mind it would be a variation. But on most recurring print defects I assume we will never know if an intentional change was made. But I do like to collect them if recurring.

I guess if PSA believes the green smudged ball on the back of the 61 Fairly is a variation, almost anything could conceivably be so classified by chance or whim of grading companies.

Wonder if any of the other kids in the photo lived to collect that card

Speaking of the 61 Fairly, and not to hijack this thread, but did you see what this PSA 8 sold for?

Insane. And not even a scan of the back to see how much of the green smudge is there.

[savedfrommyspokes]

Originally Posted by steve B

Most likely a scratched plate. Interesting, at least to me. It looks like it goes off the bottom border, so there should be a card with the scratch showing at the top right.

The location of the black in the panel could be a slight difference, or simply that batch having the black printed a bit out of register.

Plate scratches in general aren't all that common, once the plate is damaged it's often replaced.


Steve B

I looked through a number of the Frank Bolling (the card beneath the Ruth card on an uncut sheet) cards, and did not see any with this scratch on the top right.

[ALR-bishop]

Robert--wonder what a Ruth card, albeit a modern one, recognized as a variation to the 61 set would bring versus the Fairly. And you are right that while this scratch variant may be consistent in each instance it occurs, PSA is grading Fairlys with only a spec of green as a variation, as well as ones where the entire bottom of the ball is green. I would bet that if they do not show the back it is a spec version

[JollyElm]

I haven't seen any examples where the 'hair' actually goes off the bottom of the page. That's more of an illusion as it is in line with the thin piece of wood grain at the bottom of the card, making it look as though it's a continuation of the hair. Also, look at the light horizontal line at the very bottom of the card. The hair never crosses it.

[JollyElm]

Since we're talking about hairs, I thought I'd bring this card up. One of the telltale signs of the #130 green tint Frank Bolling is the stray hair appearing on his forehead. It appears as though the layout was again photographed while a hair laid atop it. I have never seen a GT version of this card without it.

130b.jpg

[MuddyMules]

Originally Posted by steve B

Most likely a scratched plate. Interesting, at least to me. It looks like it goes off the bottom border, so there should be a card with the scratch showing at the top right.

The location of the black in the panel could be a slight difference, or simply that batch having the black printed a bit out of register.

Plate scratches in general aren't all that common, once the plate is damaged it's often replaced.


Steve B

Dead on Steve. The plate was definitely scratched. When a plate is scratched, the pressman would fill the scratch on the press with a scratch remover, to keep the job running while a new plate is made. If the fill holds up during the run, then they would not replace the plate.

[ALR-bishop]

Good post Ted. Always good to have another printing guru on here. Steve has been great on this stuff

[ALR-bishop]

Carlton mentioned the Bressound as another example of a possible scratch.

This is it. It is not hard to find

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1961-Topps-2...item258aa106d6

[MuddyMules]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Carlton mentioned the Bressound as another example of a possible scratch.

This is it. It is not hard to find

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1961-Topps-2...item258aa106d6

Another scratch in the plate, which looks like it turned into a nightmare of an attempt to repair on the press. A new cyan plate was made, which is why the color differentiates from the card on the left to the card on the right (two different make-readies on the same job).