John Rogers Home and Business Searched by the FBI

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

Here's the police report when Peter Nash stole the Fred Tenney items and consigned them to Robert Edward Auction in 2007.

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

If you are reading this you probably have read the police report above when Peter Nash stole the Fred Tenney memorabilia. Below is a certification from Tim Murnane’s grandson in regards to when Peter Nash gave the Fraser’s as collateral a rare baseball book from 1897, which Nash represented that he owned, but in reality Nash stole from the gentleman below. Apparently when you lend something to Peter Nash he think he permanently owns it. Let me explain Peter Nash what you did is fraud and theft! You did this to us while my wife was going through breast cancer! Shame on you!

In the Fraser’s Judgment against the Nash’s the Judge Ordered that the book be sent back to the rightful owner. “Plaintiffs are permitted to return to Raymond Quinn and or his assignees or heirs, Mr. Quinn’s book, titled “Boston Baseball Club 1871-1897”, delivered by the Defendants Peter Nash, Roxanne Nash and Cooperstown Monument Company, Inc., and presently in Plaintiffs’ possession, without credit to any of the foregoing amounts.” The book has been returned to the rightful owner Raymond Quinn.

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

That letter was very polite. Nicer than I would have penned.

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

If you are reading this you probably have read the police report above when Peter Nash stole the Fred Tenney memorabilia. Below is a certification from Tim Murnane’s grandson in regards to when Peter Nash gave the Fraser’s as collateral a rare baseball book from 1897, which Nash represented that he owned, but in reality Nash stole from the gentleman below. Apparently when you lend something to Peter Nash he think he permanently owns it. Let me explain Peter Nash what you did is fraud and theft! You did this to us while my wife was going through breast cancer! Shame on you!

In the Fraser’s Judgment against the Nash’s the Judge Ordered that the book be sent back to the rightful owner. “Plaintiffs are permitted to return to Raymond Quinn and or his assignees or heirs, Mr. Quinn’s book, titled “Boston Baseball Club 1871-1897”, delivered by the Defendants Peter Nash, Roxanne Nash and Cooperstown Monument Company, Inc., and presently in Plaintiffs’ possession, without credit to any of the foregoing amounts.” The book has been returned to the rightful owner Raymond Quinn.

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

Hey John Rogers do you really think I believe this affidavit below that you received nothing in return for lending Peter Nash $166,200. Remember any memorabilia or assets of Peter Nash’s that you may have belong to his creditors. Do you have the “Ed Delahanty Funeral Display” which consisted of Ed Delahanty’s glove and Delahanty ephemera? That was part of my collateral from Nash and he never delivered it to me, I have a Court Order that I own it. If you have my Delahanty memorabilia or if the FBI took it please notify my attorney Barry Kozyra in NJ. I notice on your affidavit you said nothing about the money you wired to Nash’s former attorney Wolfgang Hiemerl and then the money was transfer to Peter Nash. Why the secrecy? By the way in your affidavit you said nothing about the years of 2011 and 2012, did you give money to Peter Nash during those years?

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

[Peter_Spaeth]

I wonder if Rogers has written off those loans?

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I wonder if Rogers has written off those loans?

I wonder if they were loans.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

I wonder if they were loans.

He so represented to a court under oath, I would at least start with that presumption.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

He so represented to a court under oath, I would at least start with that presumption.

I don't presume anything when it comes to this hobby. Just airing out my thoughts, and I know I'm not alone on that.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

I don't presume anything when it comes to this hobby. Just airing out my thoughts, and I know I'm not alone on that.

Good point, if it's hobby-related all normal presumptions are probably off.

[Exhibitman]

I'm going to have to go ahead and sort of disagree with Rogers' affidavit...

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

Hey John Rogers do you really think I believe this affidavit below that you received nothing in return for lending Peter Nash $166,200. Remember any memorabilia or assets of Peter Nash’s that you may have belong to his creditors. Do you have the “Ed Delahanty Funeral Display” which consisted of Ed Delahanty’s glove and Delahanty ephemera? That was part of my collateral from Nash and he never delivered it to me, I have a Court Order that I own it. If you have my Delahanty memorabilia or if the FBI took it please notify my attorney Barry Kozyra in NJ. I notice on your affidavit you said nothing about the money you wired to Nash’s former attorney Wolfgang Hiemerl and then the money was transfer to Peter Nash. Why the secrecy? By the way in your affidavit you said nothing about the years of 2011 and 2012, did you give money to Peter Nash during those years?

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

John Rogers here’s a few pages of Peter Nash’s deposition taken on June 15, 2009 which contradict your affidavit. I bet you wished you would have read Nash’s deposition before you wrote that affidavit. When Nash had this deposition he never expect that Lifson would get a Court Order to force Nash to turn over his bank records. By the way did Nash tell you that his brother in law David Dinallo lost the lawsuit you were trying to help by writing that affidavit? The Dinallo’s agreed to settle and pay Lifson $50,000 right before the trial was about to start. Peter Nash real smart move to cheat Lifson out of his money. You should have used that $166,200 to pay back Lifson, think about Nash, you would have paid Lifson off by now. Your foolishness in stonewalling Lifson and hiding money and memorabilia has cost Lifson huge legal fees which you will have to pay for after Lifson make a motion to the court.

Peter Nash I was told that your brother in law bounced a $5,000 settlement payment, not a smart move on Dinallo’s part especially being a retired attorney he know that bouncing a check is a crime. I read an article that Dinallo file criminal charges on a bar owner that bounced a check on him up state NY, see link below:

http://www.saratogian.com/general-ne...larceny-charge

John Rogers where is the Radbourn silver Providence 1880’s trophy baseball that Nash gave you? What business deal were you trying to work it into? Did you know that Nash has been Court Ordered to turn that silver baseball over to Lifson so it can be sold?

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

John Rogers here’s a few pages of Peter Nash’s deposition taken on June 15, 2009 which contradict your affidavit. I bet you wished you would have read Nash’s deposition before you wrote that affidavit. When Nash had this deposition he never expect that Lifson would get a Court Order to force Nash to turn over his bank records. By the way did Nash tell you that his brother in law David Dinallo lost the lawsuit you were trying to help by writing that affidavit? The Dinallo’s agreed to settle and pay Lifson $50,000 right before the trial was about to start. Peter Nash real smart move to cheat Lifson out of his money. You should have used that $166,200 to pay back Lifson, think about Nash, you would have paid Lifson off by now. Your foolishness in stonewalling Lifson and hiding money and memorabilia has cost Lifson huge legal fees which you will have to pay for after Lifson make a motion to the court.

Peter Nash I was told that your brother in law bounced a $5,000 settlement payment, not a smart move on Dinallo’s part especially being a retired attorney he know that bouncing a check is a crime. I read an article that Dinallo file criminal charges on a bar owner that bounced a check on him up state NY, see link below:

http://www.saratogian.com/general-ne...larceny-charge

John Rogers where is the Radbourn silver Providence 1880’s trophy baseball that Nash gave you? What business deal were you trying to work it into? Did you know that Nash has been Court Ordered to turn that silver baseball over to Lifson so it can be sold?

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

I will be creating a new thread on "Net 54 Forum Home Page" later on today. It will be called "Peter Nash where are the items you stole from me!". I'm hoping the memorabilia collecting community can help locate them, since Peter Nash has failed to obey the Court Order in returning the stolen items to me and my wife. Thank you for your concern.

Best regards,

Robert Fraser

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

I will be creating a new thread on "Net 54 Forum Home Page" later on today. It will be called "Peter Nash where are the items you stole from me!". I'm hoping the memorabilia collecting community can help locate them, since Peter Nash has failed to obey the Court Order in returning the stolen items to me and my wife. Thank you for your concern.

Best regards,

Robert Fraser

Hey John Rogers, I heard that your friend Peter Nash wants to hire an attorney to oppose a motion to the court made by Lifson's attorney to reimburse Lifson for legal fees amounting to approximately $250,000. That's not good for me and you, it's going to be a long haul before we get paid. Remember my wife and I have a Judgment against the Nash's, you don't, so we get paid first. By the way your friend Doug Allen told me about how Peter Nash stole $5,000 from Doug's credit card to pay for his attorney back in 2011. Doug told me he reported it to the credit card company and they canceled payment. Maybe you should warn Doug to cancel that credit card. It's too bad that Doug didn't press charges on Nash.

Mr. Roger's have you seen my 1912 Red Sox World Series gold diamond stickpin? Please check out the thread, "Peter Nash where are the items you stole from me!", on the first post you can see a picture of the 1912 stickpin. Did Peter Nash or Al Angelo sell it to you? In Peter Nash's affidavit paragraph 28 it says "$10,000 of the funds wired by John Rogers was intended for respondent Nash to act as an agent for Mr. Roger in a purchase of memorabilia items"... So I'm curious to know if Nash tried to sell you the stolen stickpin? See below, Peter Nash's affidavit dated March 19, 2012, I only posted 3 pages of the affidavit it's too long to post the whole thing.

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

[Peter_Spaeth]

Either Nash is a lawyer or a lawyer ghost wrote that affidavit for him. Normal people do not write, "as more fully set forth herein."

[WhenItWasAHobby]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Either Nash is a lawyer or a lawyer ghost wrote that affidavit for him. Normal people do not write, "as more fully set forth herein."

So are you saying that lawyers are abnormal people?

Sorry, I'll withdraw the question - it calls for a conclusion.