John Rogers Home and Business Searched by the FBI

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Ease

Wow, what a tangled and mangled web that has been woven.

One of the many things I sued Peter Nash for was that he made a fraudulent sales receipt saying he bought the 1912 Boston Red Sox World Series Trophy, when in fact the Fraser's bought it. Then Nash used this phony receipt to borrow money from people and one of those people was Bekim's cousin. Below is an email I sent to Bekim and copied to John Rogers, FBI, etc..

Subject: Regarding your phone call about Peter Nash

Date: 11/30/10 04:54:42 PM

From: lkochfraser@optonline.net

To: "Laiqi, Bekim"
Cc: "Thomas, Angela" , "Kozyra, Barry" , INFO@ROGERSARCHIVE.COM, "Iannuzzi, John M."

Hi Bekim,

After receiving your phone call today I thought it would be best to communicate to you in writing. You told me Peter Nash read you some emails that I sent John Rogers a memorabilia dealer from North Little Rock, Arkansas that has agreed to give Peter Nash some money to defend the lawsuit that my wife, Lisa and I have filed against Peter Nash, Roxanne Nash and Nash’s previous attorney Wolfgang Heimerl.

In our conversation you made it clear that you do not want your name mentioned in the lawsuit or involved in the lawsuit. The facts are you are involved in the lawsuit; paragraph 97 refers to you and your cousin. About three weeks ago you called me telling me Peter Nash was very upset that I mentioned you and your cousin in the lawsuit. I told you I referred to you and your cousin as creditors in paragraph 97.

Earlier this year you are the one that called Angela Thomas and got her to give you my unlisted telephone number and when you called me you told me Peter Nash owed you and your cousin money and wanted to know where Peter Nash lived because Peter refused to give you his address. It didn’t surprise me that Peter owed you money he told me that you and your cousins had lent him money many time before. I remember the time when Peter paid back a loan for $35,000 in cash at your kitchen table at your parents’ house in Bedford, NY. I sat there and watch you and Peter Nash count it.

It was very shocking when you told me that your cousin believed that he owned the 1912 WS Trophy because Peter Nash had not paid him back and that your cousin had some type of legal document signed by Peter Nash and notarized proving your cousin had ownership. You told me your cousin considered suing my wife and me for the 1912 trophy. Then on another occasion you wanted us to sell it and split the proceeds with your cousin. You also told me Peter Nash was very upset that you were talking to me and you actually said Peter was “mortified”. I spent a lot of time emailing you many documents to prove that the Frasers own the 1912 WS Trophy/Bruce Garland Collection and that the Frasers were always the owners of the Trophy and Peter Nash never had ownership in the 1912 WS Trophy/Bruce Garland Collection. The shocking thing Peter Nash did was sign a FRAUDULENT SALE AGREEMENT FOR $55,000. And then tells people that he is the owner and borrowed money against it.

After I sent you the proof that the Frasers own the 1912 WS trophy/Bruce Garland Collection you said your cousin doesn’t want to sue Peter Nash for the money but will take care of it in his own way. Obviously your cousin was scammed by Peter Nash big time but so was I. Now Peter Nash is borrowing money from some wealth memorabilia dealer in Arkansas. Maybe Peter is selling this guy the Brooklyn Bridge.

Peter Nash is a LIAR and has hurt me and my family and I will not hold back on anything. I’m sorry that you’re involved but blame that on Peter Nash. We are all victims of Peter Nash.

Regards,

Robert Fraser

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Sunny

One of the many things I sued Peter Nash for was that he made a fraudulent sales receipt saying he bought the 1912 Boston Red Sox World Series Trophy, when in fact the Fraser's bought it. Then Nash used this phony receipt to borrow money from people and one of those people was Bekim's cousin. Below is an email I sent to Bekim and copied to John Rogers, FBI, etc..

Subject: Regarding your phone call about Peter Nash

Date: 11/30/10 04:54:42 PM

From: lkochfraser@optonline.net

To: "Laiqi, Bekim"
Cc: "Thomas, Angela" , "Kozyra, Barry" , INFO@ROGERSARCHIVE.COM, "Iannuzzi, John M."

Hi Bekim,

After receiving your phone call today I thought it would be best to communicate to you in writing. You told me Peter Nash read you some emails that I sent John Rogers a memorabilia dealer from North Little Rock, Arkansas that has agreed to give Peter Nash some money to defend the lawsuit that my wife, Lisa and I have filed against Peter Nash, Roxanne Nash and Nash’s previous attorney Wolfgang Heimerl.

In our conversation you made it clear that you do not want your name mentioned in the lawsuit or involved in the lawsuit. The facts are you are involved in the lawsuit; paragraph 97 refers to you and your cousin. About three weeks ago you called me telling me Peter Nash was very upset that I mentioned you and your cousin in the lawsuit. I told you I referred to you and your cousin as creditors in paragraph 97.

Earlier this year you are the one that called Angela Thomas and got her to give you my unlisted telephone number and when you called me you told me Peter Nash owed you and your cousin money and wanted to know where Peter Nash lived because Peter refused to give you his address. It didn’t surprise me that Peter owed you money he told me that you and your cousins had lent him money many time before. I remember the time when Peter paid back a loan for $35,000 in cash at your kitchen table at your parents’ house in Bedford, NY. I sat there and watch you and Peter Nash count it.

It was very shocking when you told me that your cousin believed that he owned the 1912 WS Trophy because Peter Nash had not paid him back and that your cousin had some type of legal document signed by Peter Nash and notarized proving your cousin had ownership. You told me your cousin considered suing my wife and me for the 1912 trophy. Then on another occasion you wanted us to sell it and split the proceeds with your cousin. You also told me Peter Nash was very upset that you were talking to me and you actually said Peter was “mortified”. I spent a lot of time emailing you many documents to prove that the Frasers own the 1912 WS Trophy/Bruce Garland Collection and that the Frasers were always the owners of the Trophy and Peter Nash never had ownership in the 1912 WS Trophy/Bruce Garland Collection. The shocking thing Peter Nash did was sign a FRAUDULENT SALE AGREEMENT FOR $55,000. And then tells people that he is the owner and borrowed money against it.

After I sent you the proof that the Frasers own the 1912 WS trophy/Bruce Garland Collection you said your cousin doesn’t want to sue Peter Nash for the money but will take care of it in his own way. Obviously your cousin was scammed by Peter Nash big time but so was I. Now Peter Nash is borrowing money from some wealth memorabilia dealer in Arkansas. Maybe Peter is selling this guy the Brooklyn Bridge.

Peter Nash is a LIAR and has hurt me and my family and I will not hold back on anything. I’m sorry that you’re involved but blame that on Peter Nash. We are all victims of Peter Nash.

Regards,

Robert Fraser

I think a film about all of this would be very interesting!!

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by Leon

I think a film about all of this would be very interesting!!

Only if it ends with Peter Nash in prison.

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

Only if it ends with Peter Nash in prison.

Peter Nash I see that you wrote an article about Roger Connor’s signature. But what about the Roger Connor signature you gave to me as collateral. The back of this 1889 NY Giants team photo (bottom left corner) it has written on it “Return to R. Connor Springfield Mass.” It also says “Send back to Murnane Globe”. Did you get this when you bought the Tim Murnane collection from Murnane’s grandson? Murnane’s grandson told me you bought the collection for $50,000. Comparing the Connor signature I have to Heritage’s mine looks good. In deposition you told Barry Kozyra, Esq. you believe that the Roger Connor signature I have is good. Nash you need to give provenance to where you got this cabinet photo from so I can sell it and apply it to your Judgment! You go on and on about other people’s provenance but what about your own items! Do I have have to get a Court Order to make you answer and don’t forget any legal fees I spend you will eventually have to pay for. I hope this Roger Connor signature I have as collateral wasn’t stolen like the Fred Tenney stuff you stole and consigned to Robert Edward Auctions in 2007 and then they obtain a Court Order to have the Fred Tenney items returned to the rightful owner. Peter Nash why don’t you post the Cooperstown, NY Police report when the rightful owner of the Tenney items reported the memorabilia stolen? After all your website is called Hauls of Shame! If anyone would like to buy this Connor signature please contact me.

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif

[Peter_Spaeth]

Robert it sounds like you are in need of some supplementary proceedings if you have not already gone that route.

[jhs5120]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Robert it sounds like you are in need of some supplementary proceedings if you have not already gone that route.

+1

It seems like the route you are currently taking is not working. You cannot sit around and wait for Nash to provide providence to each and every item he has given you. He's not going to, ever.

It might be time to take further legal action.

[Cardboard Junkie]

I'm not a lawyer, Robert, but it might be wise to consult a lawyer about posting here. Don't want to get hung by your own petard. Dave.

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by jhs5120

+1

It seems like the route you are currently taking is not working. You cannot sit around and wait for Nash to provide providence to each and every item he has given you. He's not going to, ever.

It might be time to take further legal action.

Let me explain the Judge awarded the Fraser’s all rights, title and legal interest to all items of collateral and we have the right to sell them and then apply the money to the Judgment. I have the right to sell this stuff right now and be done with it. It’s in Roxanne and Peter Nash’s interest to help sell the collateral and get top dollar, but Peter Nash has refused to help.

The simple fact is Peter Nash has done this before but in a much bigger way. When a huge amount of Nash’s memorabilia was being held by Robert Edward Auctions for none payment, Peter Nash decided to plead the fifth dozens of times and caused his memorabilia by Court Order to be sold in an “AS IS” auction and John Rogers bought it for $550,000. I was told by somebody that works for Lelands Auctions that Rogers sold 3 items and got all of his money back. I wonder if those 3 items are the items that are now in “The National Pastime Museum” the online museum that opened last year. Those 3 items are the King Kelly bat, Hugh Duffy bat and Ed Delahanty pocket watch. Where did John Rogers get the provenance for those 3 items when Robert Edward Auctions couldn’t? After all Nash pleaded the fifth. Makes no sense to me, although Nash did counter sue me for ruining his business relationship with John Rogers but the Judge threw out Nash’s counter suit. I bid on the “AS IS” sale for $250,000 because I knew that some of the stuff was real such as the Hugh Duffy Trophy from 1898. I was friends with Nash when he bought the Hugh Duffy Trophy from the Dooley family for $25,000 along with 53 other items. But why did Nash plead the fifth? Why didn’t Nash show Rob Lifson the owner of Robert Edward Auctions the sale receipt from Katherine Dooley? Peter Nash even named his dog Dooley, kid you not. So why did Nash plead the fifth knowing that the Hugh Duffy Trophy was real and had a sale receipt proving he purchased it? Is it because Nash had no sales receipt for the Hugh Duffy bat and the King Kelly bat that came from the Dooley family? Below is the link to the Hugh Duffy Trophy that sold in legendary Auctions for $36,000.

http://www.legendaryauctions.com/Lot...entoryid=95313

I spoke with Katherine Dooley's attorney Jeff Roberts last year and he told me that Peter Nash was allowed to take items from Katherine Dooley's house and get them appraised. But Peter Nash never gave them anything in writing what was appraised. Did Nash take this stuff to Robert Edward Auctions to get it appraised but instead borrow money against it? I don't know but it doesn't look good when you read this email from Katherine Dooley's attorney, see below.

Subject: RE: Peter Nash - Katherine (Kitty) Dooley

Date: 05/29/13 03:43:50 PM

From: "Jeffrey Roberts"

To: "'lkochfraser@optonline.net'"
Cc: "Matthew Lee"


Dear Robert,

This email serves to confirm our conversation regarding the appraisal of items owned by Katherine Dooley. At some point, although we do not know the exact date, Ms. Dooley gave Peter Nash permission to seek appraisals of some of her baseball memorabilia. Regrettably, we cannot confirm the date these appraisals occurred, the items that were appraised or their appraised value.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

Jeff

Jeffrey W. Roberts
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
Seaport West
155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston, MA 02210
Direct line 617.439.2149 Fax 617.310.9149
www.nutter.com

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Robert it sounds like you are in need of some supplementary proceedings if you have not already gone that route.

My asset recovery is already happening. The Fraser’s Judgment in fraud against the Nash’s have been filed in Saratoga County Clerk’s Office in NY where the Nash’s live. Including interest the Judgment is now $500,000 plus. A Transcript of Judgment has been file in Otsego County, NY putting a lien on the property the Nash’s own in Cooperstown/Middlefield, NY which has been in foreclosure for approximately 6 years. Although I expect nothing from the property because between the money owed to the bank and the IRS there probably won’t be anything left for any other creditors. My attorney’s next move is wage garnishment and selling Nash’s website Hauls of Shame. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Chris or Steve Ivy bid on the website I’m sure they would like to own it and I’m sure they can out bid Nash’s buddy John Rogers if he bids on it.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Forgive my ignorance, but why does the website have value?

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by Leon

I think a film about all of this would be very interesting!!

I think this could be part of a larger 30 for 30 about fraud in the memorabilia industry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

I think this could be part of a larger 30 for 30 about fraud in the memorabilia industry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm afraid you need more than thirty minutes for that one.

[Rich Klein]

for at least an hour so more than 30 minutes is already assumed. 30 for 30 meant 30 documentaries covering the 1st 30 years (or now more) of ESPN.

Don't worry, there will be plenty of time to talk about all these characters.

Rich

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by Rich Klein

for at least an hour so more than 30 minutes is already assumed. 30 for 30 meant 30 documentaries covering the 1st 30 years (or now more) of ESPN.

Don't worry, there will be plenty of time to talk about all these characters.

Rich

I stand corrected. I don't pay much attention to the Worldwide Leader anymore.