John Rogers Home and Business Searched by the FBI

[D. Bergin]

Perhaps Josh was pissed because he was afraid Nash would write several hit pieces on his auctions if he attempted to sell his collateral, in essence sabotaging several of his auctions in the process.

It may not always be a case of whether it's real or not, but whether or not you might get stuck in a legal entanglement, similar to what Robert Edward Auctions has gone through with Nash.

I could also picture Nash getting some sort of an injunction against the sale of his "collateral".

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

I am relatively new to collecting. What did Nash do? I know there has to be a great story behind all of this.

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

I am relatively new to collecting. What did Nash do? I know there has to be a great story behind all of this.

Here’s something to get you started an article from sports Illustrated about Peter Nash.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...us/12/09/nash/

[WhenItWasAHobby]

Originally Posted by Sunny

Here’s something to get you started an article from sports Illustrated about Peter Nash.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...us/12/09/nash/

That article has been discussed a while ago. This statement has become a hobby truism:

For all its many upstanding, passionate collectors, the baseball-memorabilia subculture is also a notoriously seedy shadowland of Mametesque schemers and dreamers, thick with forgeries and thefts, conflicts of interest, dubious "authenticators," shill bidding, card doctoring and any number of other dubious practices. "The hobby is mostly filled with low-life hucksters, some of whom grow up to own important auction houses," says a longtime collector of early baseball material. "You can count the number of people who are smart and educated and honest on one hand."

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby

That article has been discussed a while ago. This statement has become a hobby truism:

For all its many upstanding, passionate collectors, the baseball-memorabilia subculture is also a notoriously seedy shadowland of Mametesque schemers and dreamers, thick with forgeries and thefts, conflicts of interest, dubious "authenticators," shill bidding, card doctoring and any number of other dubious practices. "The hobby is mostly filled with low-life hucksters, some of whom grow up to own important auction houses," says a longtime collector of early baseball material. "You can count the number of people who are smart and educated and honest on one hand."

Dan those last two sentences might be a slight exaggeration but unfortunately it's closer to the truth than it should be.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

Dan those last two sentences might be a slight exaggeration but unfortunately it's closer to the truth than it should be.

Sadly, I agree. So what we've got is a bunch of slime balls calling each other slimeballs, and us arguing about who is the biggest slimeball.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by Sunny

Here’s something to get you started an article from sports Illustrated about Peter Nash.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...us/12/09/nash/

Thanks for the link. Sounds like a dirtbag.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

Thanks for the link. Sounds like a dirtbag.

Sounds like a bunch of dirtbags.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by Cardboard Junkie

Sounds like a bunch of dirtbags.

Who are the other members of the "bunch?"

[Cardboard Junkie]

The thieves, liars, cheats, etc, mentioned in the previous 140 posts.

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

Here’s something to get you started an article from sports Illustrated about Peter Nash.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...us/12/09/nash/

Peter Nash you are the conman. You conned my wife and I out of $11,000 to pay your rent at the house you used to rent in Saratoga Springs, NY. Your credit was so bad you made a deal with the landlord to pay 6 months’ rent up front.

Besides cheating us out of the $11,000, you gave us a bunch of tainted memorabilia as collateral. After we won the lawsuit you have refused to help us sell the collateral. Is it possible that some of the collateral you gave us is stolen? After all one of the items of collateral you gave us was a book entitled “Boston Baseball Club 1871-1897” that was owned by Tim Murnane’s grandson, Raymond Quinn. But you lied and claimed you owned the book and put a value of $2,500 on it and gave it to us as collateral, that is called FRAUD Peter Nash or in other words stolen property. As you are aware the Judge Ordered the book returned to Raymond Quinn which has been done. It’s my understanding the value you put on the book was high. Did you put that price of $2,500 on the book because it had Tim Murnane’s signature inside the book? I would like to know because I want to tell Raymond Quinn. Here’s a nice article baseball historian John Thorn wrote on sportswriter/baseball player Tim Murnane.

http://ourgame.mlblogs.com/2013/05/0...t-of-the-game/

Peter Nash I see that after you used up the $11,000 you were evicted out of the house, see below.

WebCivil Local - Case Detail

Court: Saratoga Springs City Court
Index Number: LT-002832-07/SS
Case Name: MARKS, LINDA COSEO, f/k/a LINDA COSEO
vs.
NASH, PETER
NASH, ROXANNE
Case Type: Landlord and Tenant
Classification: Non-Payment
Filing Date: 11/09/2007
Disposition Date: 11/21/2007
Calendar Number:
Jury Demand: No
Judge Name: Honorable Douglas C. Mills

Attorney/Firm(s) For Petitioner - LINDA COSEO MARKS:
DEAN M COON ESQ Attorney Type: Attorney
188 CHURCH STREET
SARATOGA SPRINGS, New York 12866
518-584-6300


Attorney/Firm(s) For Respondent - ROXANNE NASH:
Self-Represented Litigant

Attorney/Firm(s) For Respondent - PETER NASH:
Self-Represented Litigant

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by D. Bergin

Perhaps Josh was pissed because he was afraid Nash would write several hit pieces on his auctions if he attempted to sell his collateral, in essence sabotaging several of his auctions in the process.

It may not always be a case of whether it's real or not, but whether or not you might get stuck in a legal entanglement, similar to what Robert Edward Auctions has gone through with Nash.

I could also picture Nash getting some sort of an injunction against the sale of his "collateral".

I get your point. Peter Nash gets sued by so many people. Check this out, here's a lawsuit from Lelands Auctions suing Peter Nash. What was this lawsuit about Josh Evans? Does this lawsuit have any reason why Peter Nash never writes anything about you? I guess Peter you didn't know John Rogers back then so you couldn't get money from him to fund your lawsuit. You could have asked one of Bekim Laiqi's cousins to borrow money from or maybe you were to deep into them by then. You know Pete how you used to tell me how you had to pay the vig.

WebCivil Local - Case Detail


Court: New York County Civil Court
Index Number: CV-008757-99/NY
Case Name: HOUSE, LELAND'S AUCTION vs. NASH, PETER
Case Type: Civil
Classification:
Filing Date: 03/22/1999
Disposition Date: 06/12/2000
Calendar Number:
Jury Demand: No
Judge Name:


Attorney/Firm(s) For Plaintiff - LELAND'S AUCTION HOUSE:
HERRICK & FEINSTEIN Attorney Type: Firm
2 PARK AVENUE
New York, New York 10016
2125921400


Attorney/Firm(s) For Defendant - PETER NASH: