 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
01-10-2014, 11:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Without seeing the photo in person, I can say that a matte texture should not be of concern. There was both glossy and matte photo paper available to photographers back then. It's just that the glossy paper was more commonly used.
And after looking at a pile of the normal dime-a-dozen glossy photos, a vintage matte one does stand out as unusual if not a bit odd. So I can see why you posted your question. Last edited by drcy; 01-10-2014 at 12:02 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| its time to play. Real or Fake Pete Rose | albertheras | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 03-25-2014 02:36 AM |
| baseball/football/basketball real photo and real photo postcard lot | bryson22 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 01-17-2011 10:04 PM |
| Old Catchers Mask? If so, what time period? | canjond | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 05-31-2009 07:48 PM |
| Ebay versus REA, almost real time comparison | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-04-2005 07:45 PM |
| Sun Picture Camera Photo Pack-photoprints | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-27-2005 02:39 PM |
Threaded Mode