 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-26-2013, 03:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I absolutely disagree
about Jackson/Shirley only being considered tough in the last 5 years. I have considereded it the toughest card in the set since at least 1993 as have many other vintage card dealers. It is almost always one of the last cards on peoples lists. I have also bought many collections of 1966 high numbers and Coleman is and always has been far easier in my mind than Jackson/Shirley. I worked for probably the leading vintage Topps card dealer for about 5 years from the late nineties to early 2000s and he always considered Jackson the toughest card as well. I agree 100% about those 1967s being tougher that you mentioned.
Last edited by glynparson; 12-26-2013 at 03:55 AM. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lot of 13 different 1965 Topps High Numbers | vintagetoppsguy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-16-2013 07:01 PM |
| F/T: 1970 Topps high numbers | SmokyBurgess | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 11-29-2012 07:26 AM |
| Did You Buy '52 Topps High Numbers As A Kid? | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 03-25-2010 10:42 PM |
| O/T - Did You Buy '52 Topps High Numbers As A Kid? | toppcat | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 03-03-2010 11:12 PM |
| Nice lot of 52 Topps high numbers | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2006 08:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
