SGC vs PSA - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2013, 11:22 PM
jerrys's Avatar
jerrys jerrys is offline
Je.rry Spillm@n
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,054
Default

Mike C. says......only really shows two cards that are probably mistakes...the first two.
Probably!? These are shameful products of a professional grading company!

Also "...but IMO SGC makes slightly fewer (mistakes), making them my choice for the most part..."
perhaps you should consider that PSA is a much larger business and grades a great many more cards than SGC.

I took time to demonstrated extreme grading inconsistencies but they are condoned for bias reasons. Shame.


Perhaps some gross mistakes made by other grading companies could be shown here rather than the "oh yea" type comment - "the same things apply to PSA as well" - that is just too simple a reply. Show them!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-23-2013, 11:41 PM
freakhappy's Avatar
freakhappy freakhappy is offline
Mike C@.v3
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: OHIO
Posts: 2,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrys View Post
Mike C. says......only really shows two cards that are probably mistakes...the first two.
Probably!? These are shameful products of a professional grading company!

Also "...but IMO SGC makes slightly fewer (mistakes), making them my choice for the most part..."
perhaps you should consider that PSA is a much larger business and grades a great many more cards than SGC.

I took time to demonstrated extreme grading inconsistencies but they are condoned for bias reasons. Shame.


Perhaps some gross mistakes made by other grading companies could be shown here rather than the "oh yea" type comment - "the same things apply to PSA as well" - that is just too simple a reply. Show them!
I'm not a PSA hater, that's why I made the comments that I did. EVERY TPG makes mistakes....EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Make sure you read that over and over so it sticks. I know the whole volume thing with PSA, but I've seen a lot more inconsistencies with them vs SGC...A LOT. You showed two examples I didn't comment for a while because it wasn't worth my time.

If you read this board, you know all about PSA and their roller coaster grading...I truly believed you knew about this already? Do we need to bring up the PSA 6 with paper loss...do we really? A big ole COME ON MAN!

Like I've said before, I like PSA, but over the last few years and several thousands of cards, I choose SGC for prewar. I don't mind if you or anyone else feels differently. It is what it is...

Don't be a hater because I reject the Kool-Aid
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520
T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50
T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132
1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2013, 10:21 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrys View Post
Mike C. says......only really shows two cards that are probably mistakes...the first two.
Probably!? These are shameful products of a professional grading company!

Also "...but IMO SGC makes slightly fewer (mistakes), making them my choice for the most part..."
perhaps you should consider that PSA is a much larger business and grades a great many more cards than SGC.

I took time to demonstrated extreme grading inconsistencies but they are condoned for bias reasons. Shame.


Perhaps some gross mistakes made by other grading companies could be shown here rather than the "oh yea" type comment - "the same things apply to PSA as well" - that is just too simple a reply. Show them!
Ok,

After I get done with the holidays and shopping and travel I'll have time to go through Ebay to find the boatload of PSA 5s and 4s with bad corners and even creases. Then save off pictures I don't really need, upload them and write some comments. I have a life, and I'm a bit busy, but when I get a chance I'll do that.

SGC makes mistakes, but the level of willful blindness I sometimes see in the PSA crowd is a good argument for TPG.

Steve B
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2013, 10:03 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B View Post
Ok,

After I get done with the holidays and shopping and travel I'll have time to go through Ebay to find the boatload of PSA 5s and 4s with bad corners and even creases. Then save off pictures I don't really need, upload them and write some comments. I have a life, and I'm a bit busy, but when I get a chance I'll do that.

SGC makes mistakes, but the level of willful blindness I sometimes see in the PSA crowd is a good argument for TPG.

Steve B
Ok, now that I'm back............Just a quick look
PSA 4 with a nice corner crease.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-1911-T2...item4acb7def9e

3.5 with a creased corner.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-Bill-Hi...-/370971716850

3 with a crease and one really bad corner.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-11-T206...-/321284282509

3 with two big creases and staining.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-Pat-McC...-/380803449664

A couple more really rough 3s one with lots of creasing, the other with paperloss on the front.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-George-...-/360821894971

http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-Willie-...-/380803415795

PSA 5 with a crease.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-11-T206...item4ace09188e

All the main companies make mistakes, probably at about the same rate. But as someone else pointed out PSA has done more cards overall, so their mistakes might seem more common.

Steve B
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2013, 10:24 PM
the 'stache's Avatar
the 'stache the 'stache is offline
Bill Gregory
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 3,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrys View Post

Perhaps some gross mistakes made by other grading companies could be shown here rather than the "oh yea" type comment - "the same things apply to PSA as well" - that is just too simple a reply. Show them!


What do I win?
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps.

Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-01-2014, 09:37 AM
jerrys's Avatar
jerrys jerrys is offline
Je.rry Spillm@n
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,054
Default

Someone else?

Good work Steve - especially the Keeler paper loss 3 and the creased 4 and 5.

There is no excuse at all for such blatant grading errors to get by quality control of any professional grading service.

IMO a couple of other substandard examples:

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-01-2014, 10:23 AM
slipk1068's Avatar
slipk1068 slipk1068 is offline
Dav1d Sh1p$ey
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B View Post
All the main companies make mistakes, probably at about the same rate.
You call them "mistakes", I call it TPG corruption, preferential treatment, or printing money for their best customers/friends. I have never submitted a card with a crease and had it come back a 4 and I suspect I never will.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrys View Post
Someone else?
I think it has been covered adequately in this and many other threads. Do you really need to see more examples?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:19 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slipk1068 View Post
You call them "mistakes", I call it TPG corruption, preferential treatment, or printing money for their best customers/friends. I have never submitted a card with a crease and had it come back a 4 and I suspect I never will.
I have. This card has a light crease down the center. Either from removal from a page, or from when I removed it from the mylar sleeve that was stuck to the toploader.

Ok, it didn't get a 4. So I'm not exactly right.

Aside from the light crease the card is nice. Maybe a 60? Maybe a bit better?
When I sent it off I was hoping for a 35, expecting a 30.

And my prominence as a customer of SGC is solidly in the "Steve who? " category. I send in roughly 10 cards a year on average.

Steve B

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:51 AM
slipk1068's Avatar
slipk1068 slipk1068 is offline
Dav1d Sh1p$ey
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 878
Default

Glad to hear it. Perhaps, I am too cynical.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:58 AM
Republicaninmass Republicaninmass is offline
T3d $h3rm@n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,642
Default

Since we are clearly only renting these collectible for our short period of time on this planet, my only concern is that when it comes time to sell, what will give me, or my kin the largest return.


PSA (for now)
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" ©

Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 AM.


ebay GSB