NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used > Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2013, 04:27 AM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,759
Default

I don't want to come off as the Grinch here, but I have always felt that the 1987 Topps set is arguably the least attractive set ever. Additionally, it was so massively over produced.

Why would anyone choose that set to be the one that they would want to get completely signed?

Last edited by Scott Garner; 12-19-2013 at 04:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2013, 06:35 AM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Garner View Post
I don't want to come off as the Grinch here, but I have always felt that the 1987 Topps set is arguably the least attractive set ever. Additionally, it was so massively over produced.

Why would anyone choose that set to be the one that they would want to get completely signed?
I believe you are in the minority on that...no doubt it was overproduced, probably more so than any Topps set ever, but if you took a poll I would bet it's the most popular design of all 1980s Topps sets.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2013, 06:44 AM
mschwade mschwade is offline
M@tt Schw@de
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slidekellyslide View Post
I believe you are in the minority on that...no doubt it was overproduced, probably more so than any Topps set ever, but if you took a poll I would bet it's the most popular design of all 1980s Topps sets.
I take offense to that Scott! (*WINK*) The 1987 set was ICONIC! That was the first set I remember collecting and would go to all the drug stores and get my 35 cent pack any chance I could.

I used that same template to announce the arrival of our first born!


Last edited by mschwade; 12-19-2013 at 06:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2013, 07:04 AM
btcarfagno btcarfagno is offline
T0m C@rf@gn0
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mschwade View Post
I take offense to that Scott! (*WINK*) The 1987 set was ICONIC! That was the first set I remember collecting and would go to all the drug stores and get my 35 cent pack any chance I could.

I used that same template to announce the arrival of our first born!

That is awesome on so many different levels I don't even know where to begin.

Tom C
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2013, 09:51 AM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mschwade View Post
I take offense to that Scott! (*WINK*) The 1987 set was ICONIC! That was the first set I remember collecting and would go to all the drug stores and get my 35 cent pack any chance I could.

I used that same template to announce the arrival of our first born!

Matt,
Sorry about that, Chief!

I do love this card! Nice job, it looks great! How old is your son now?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-19-2013, 11:24 AM
mschwade mschwade is offline
M@tt Schw@de
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Garner View Post
Matt,
Sorry about that, Chief!

I do love this card! Nice job, it looks great! How old is your son now?
Thanks! He's 4, my second son is 2 (Sports Illustrated cover for his announcement), and seeking ideas for the announcement for our third that is due in the middle of 2014
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-19-2013, 11:58 AM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mschwade View Post
Thanks! He's 4, my second son is 2 (Sports Illustrated cover for his announcement), and seeking ideas for the announcement for our third that is due in the middle of 2014
The Sporting News
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-19-2013, 12:11 PM
parker1b2's Avatar
parker1b2 parker1b2 is offline
J0n@th@n P@rker
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mschwade View Post
I take offense to that Scott! (*WINK*) The 1987 set was ICONIC! That was the first set I remember collecting and would go to all the drug stores and get my 35 cent pack any chance I could.

I used that same template to announce the arrival of our first born!

What an awesome idea, wish I would of thought of something like this when my son was born. Great card.

I don't collect cards anymore unless there autographed, but the 87 Topps were the first packs I started to buy and introduced me into the hobby. Remember getting a Jose Canseco in a pack and thinking it was the greatest card in the world at 10 years old.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-19-2013, 09:49 AM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slidekellyslide View Post
I believe you are in the minority on that...no doubt it was overproduced, probably more so than any Topps set ever, but if you took a poll I would bet it's the most popular design of all 1980s Topps sets.
Wow, I never would have guessed.

BTW, two non-Topps sets that I always liked from the 1980's and 1990's were 1984 Donruss and 1990 Leaf. Both were really great sets to look at. I loved opening these packs when I was still a card collector....

Last edited by Scott Garner; 12-19-2013 at 09:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-19-2013, 10:18 AM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Garner View Post
Wow, I never would have guessed.

BTW, two non-Topps sets that I always liked from the 1980's and 1990's were 1984 Donruss and 1990 Leaf. Both were really great sets to look at. I loved opening these packs when I was still a card collector....
As far as aesthetics go the 1984 Donruss set was IMO their best...I didn't care much for new cards after Upper Deck got involved and things started getting shiny. If I were to collect new cards today I think just about the only product I would buy would be the Heritage stuff that Topps puts out...I just like real cardboard.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-19-2013, 02:23 PM
MooseDog's Avatar
MooseDog MooseDog is offline
J Stone
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Garner View Post
I don't want to come off as the Grinch here, but I have always felt that the 1987 Topps set is arguably the least attractive set ever. Additionally, it was so massively over produced.

Why would anyone choose that set to be the one that they would want to get completely signed?
Scott -

While I sort of agree with you, in terms of autographs, the 1987 Topps set takes a sharpie exceptionally well and the set is filled with waist up portraits and head shots. So from a pictorial perspective it's a good set for 'graphing.

Additionally, since it was so grossly overproduced, there was no shortage of them lying around when heading out to get IP autographs. Just a guess, but there may be more signed 1987 Topps cards than any other just because…

But yeah, it is a butt-ugly design.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-19-2013, 03:05 PM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MooseDog View Post
Scott -

While I sort of agree with you, in terms of autographs, the 1987 Topps set takes a sharpie exceptionally well and the set is filled with waist up portraits and head shots. So from a pictorial perspective it's a good set for 'graphing.

Additionally, since it was so grossly overproduced, there was no shortage of them lying around when heading out to get IP autographs. Just a guess, but there may be more signed 1987 Topps cards than any other just because…

But yeah, it is a butt-ugly design.
Gotcha! That makes sense as far as having lots of waist up portraits and head shots... Thanks for the explanation.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-02-2014, 12:22 PM
earlywynnfan's Avatar
earlywynnfan earlywynnfan is offline
Ke.n Su.lik
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,258
Default

looks like the OP was correct: this seller never sent the card!
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAP...84.m1423.l2776
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSA/DNA Slabbed Walter Payton Signed 1987 Topps card $40 PRICE DROP! cardcollectorguru Autographs & Game Used B/S/T 2 12-03-2013 11:15 AM
FS: 2002 Ricky Henderson signed GU Boston Red Sox Bat 69Cubfan Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 2 03-25-2012 10:03 AM
Signed T206 Walter Johnson - ebay - Stolen Scan T206Collector Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 38 12-07-2011 03:37 PM
Harry Wright Letters Stolen; then Found? Rich Klein Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 1 07-05-2009 06:01 AM
Stolen scan from Milehigh Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 02-27-2008 04:26 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 AM.


ebay GSB