![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not so sure on this one. We need to see the back of that scorecard. If it isn't blank (most scorecards have something on all sides for advertising) then that isn't where they came from.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-16-2020 at 05:04 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think every discovery in this hobby is amazing; the fact that we're still finding out things about century-old cards is incredible to me.
That said, Jim's N167s are pretty incredible, simply due to their value and rarity. That would be my vote. -Al |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Have to agree. I will go with Jim's N167 also. The more we know about a set the more intriguing it is to "discover" something we didn't know. I am in the camp of us learning a ton more over time. A few years ago the Blanke Wenneker Nadja box was a pretty big deal in that we never knew where Nadja's came from. Also, the T202 with Jackson sliding was pretty cool.....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the props guys. For me, a big part of what made this so exciting is that it is really the first baseball card set in the traditional sense.
JimB ![]() ![]() Last edited by E93; 12-13-2013 at 10:35 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Definitely a great discovery and achievement Jim....beautiful cards.
The 42+ Red Hindu find, for me not so much the # but that a few examples finally confirmed. As well as two Cobbs + two T210 Jacksons...great discovery. ![]() Last edited by atx840; 12-13-2013 at 10:46 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have to go with Brian's discovery of the Frank Smith M116 card with the Boston caption. One of one, as far as I know and both interesting and shocking. Had it been a T206 instead of an M116, a greatly undervalued and unappreciated set, collectors would be in a tizzy.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Bob for bringing it up...I am quite partial to the M116 Smith Boston discovery. However the Derby Cigars scorecard discovery is quite intriquing, and would be interesting to know what is on the backside. How did I miss the Derby thread? Just found the link: http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ighlight=Derby
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 12-13-2013 at 01:33 PM. Reason: added link |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim's feat was so noteworthy that I think we should have a thread for 2nd-best discovery. I know Jim is an incredibly humble guy, but this was a great thing for the hobby - putting together the first set. Who knows, perhaps no one was able to do it, even back when the cards came out?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2013 Hall of Fame "Special" Induction 7/28...any Net54 members attending? | orator1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-28-2013 05:38 PM |
2013 Press Pass Cy Young Cut Auto Inscribed "Peoli" 1 of 1 !!!! | sprtsrul11 | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 3 | 06-01-2013 09:57 AM |
Anybody interested in a 2013 "Team Net54 Case break"?? | sdkammeyer | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 02-11-2013 04:40 PM |
Made a "HUGE" PCL Find Today...Need Help identifying year and players | slidekellyslide | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-27-2011 09:35 PM |
Exciting New Discovery: Archibald "Moonlight" Graham item (Field of Dreams) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 07-10-2008 11:38 AM |