![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Waz
I saw that same card recently on the Bay, I figured it was paper loss and decided not to take the chance. Like you said, either way its a nice card for the price you paid. I do remember years ago, we had a member here post a T206 with a Sweet Caporal back that was missing the second "s" in "subjects" on the back. The member examined the card and was positive the missing "s" was not from paper loss. Nice pick-up! Jantz |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Only 109 Subjects in the T206 350/460 & 460 Series? | PolarBear | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-03-2013 11:38 AM |
FS: 5 T206 Sovereign 350 Subjects | tinkertoeverstochance | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 08-02-2012 02:48 PM |
T206-150 Series Subjects | JohnP0621 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-14-2011 07:14 PM |
Theories on T206 backs having fewer subjects | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-22-2007 10:34 PM |
Were T206's printed on sheets of 48 Subjects ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 04-27-2007 08:50 AM |