 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
11-30-2013, 01:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I think it's a a tough call returning a graded card. Honestly if you weren't comfortable with the pictures offered maybe you should have passed on bidding? I'd never return a card that was slabbed personally and as pointed out, card still looks great.
I think you are right on by offering the seller to keep $15 for the relist and his shipping costs. That's a class move on your part if you do insist on returning it. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| THANKS, BUT I STILL CAN'T FIND #109 CARD CLARKE DO YOU THINK BECKETT HAS THE WRONG # CARD? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-15-2009 10:04 PM |
| What's wrong with this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-23-2007 08:15 PM |
| What is wrong with the back of this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-12-2006 01:46 PM |
| Do you see anything wrong with this card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-06-2006 12:59 PM |
| can anyone tell me what's wrong with this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-18-2005 12:57 AM |
Threaded Mode