NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2013, 09:43 PM
KCRfan1 KCRfan1 is offline
Lou Simcoe
L0u Sim.coe
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Olathe KS
Posts: 1,718
Default

I stay away from intentional damage, a light crease I can live with. I am ok with an o/c card if the eye appeal is nice. My pet peave is sharp corners on newer issues ( 52 Topps to more recent ). Rounded corners on those cards I never consider.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2013, 11:15 PM
CW's Avatar
CW CW is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,540
Default

I tend to avoid cards that are severely off-centered or have bad creasing that runs through the face of the player. For some special cards, though, I could live with such flaws (eg. a 51 Bowman Mantle). Writing on the back wouldn't bother me at all, and rounded corners add character.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-22-2013, 03:18 AM
7nohitter's Avatar
7nohitter 7nohitter is offline
Member
And.rew Mil.ler
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 1,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CW View Post
I tend to avoid cards that are severely off-centered or have bad creasing that runs through the face of the player. For some special cards, though, I could live with such flaws (eg. a 51 Bowman Mantle). Writing on the back wouldn't bother me at all, and rounded corners add character.
Exactly...70/30 centering is as 'bad' as I'll go...really bothers my eye when cards are so OC....but creasing, rounded corners don't bother me at all.

Writing is a no-no...as is paper loss.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-22-2013, 04:43 AM
brewing's Avatar
brewing brewing is offline
Br.ent !ngr@m
Br.ent Ing@am
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,132
Default

As a new owner of a 53 Bowman Mantle with paper loss on the back, there are not many flaws that would discourage me.

The worst flaw to me, is the hole punch.
__________________
Tiger collector
Need: Harry Heilmann auto
Monster Number 520/520
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2013, 06:44 AM
Samsdaddy Samsdaddy is offline
Erik
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 389
Default

I do not mind rough cuts and off centering up to 80 - 20. I do not even mind miscuts and I can deal with a hairline crease and a fuzzy corner or two.

All my cards are in their "natural" or "raw" state and that is how I prefer them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2013, 07:43 AM
Prof_Plum Prof_Plum is offline
bi11h00d
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 209
Default

The front of the card, or player's picture, is more important to me than the back. So I can live with more flaws (e.g. paper loss, writing, surface crease) on the back than on the front where my tolerance is much lower. Centering is more important than rounded corners. And very slight trimming, where the standard card's size has not been obviously altered is okay.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2013, 10:47 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,397
Default

For me it depends on the card and the price.

For a tough or expensive card at a great price? nearly any flaw or group of flaws is just fine.

For a really common card? Almost none unless it's really cheap. I don't check big boxes of commons all that closely, except to get an idea of what sets are included. And if it's a 5000 count box for under $20 I might not even spend much time on that.

Steve B
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1948-leaf-collecting printing flaws mightyq Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 4 02-05-2010 01:53 PM
What is accepted and acceptable? Results. Thanks to all who replied. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 50 08-25-2008 07:34 AM
What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 86 04-23-2008 07:58 PM
1941 Playball - Variation - Flaws - Fakes or ??? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 12-04-2006 11:03 PM
Strip cards - acceptable cuts Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 09-29-2001 12:38 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.


ebay GSB