![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The one Todd posted seems to have the identical caption. The shorter letters and a few other pointers. So right now I'm leaning towards it being real.
We could line up a few Magies in a similar animation, that would tell us a lot of stuff. If the caption is brown and was laid out from a master that had the caption then the realtionship between the P and caption should stay the same for an entire press run. (Barring of course minor changes from humidity, shrinkage etc which should be very small.) If the captions were done in brown apart from the artwork then it would vary, but should be consistent for each position on the sheet. The other colors should move in your animation because of varying registration. If they didn't that would indicate cards produced at nearly the same time. Now that Todd has posted one that's nearly identical, I think the card is more interesting than it first appears. I've become convinced there were at least three printings with slightly changed artwork for at least some of the 150 series. Maybe more than that. I've been studying Magie because I believed it would have only been on one sheet since it's uncommon, maybe even rare. This one along with the one Todd posted is making me totally rethink that. There are a few little things that are exactly right between the two. Like the tiny frame break just left of the top center. But the remnant of an alignment mark in red at the top center is different. The Ebay card also appears to have less red overall, so maybe it's just underinked. The caption seems more gray than brown on both. I've seen this on other T206s but haven't started tracking it other than a note that it happens. I'd thought it might simply be the use of a different brown, but it could also be the caption being on a different color plate. There are a few things I can think of that photoshop might tell us about color, but it won't be at all conclusive for a lot of reasons. (Unless we had the cards in hand, but Magie is on my "probably never" list ![]() I have been able to link particular Magie fronts with particular backs. I was getting ready to start organizing the scans so I could get the info ready for posting. I can also say that more than one plate was reworked to make the corrected version, since I have a scan of a Magie and Magee with identical recognizable backs and some front differences aside from the caption. I'll have to see if the back of the Ebay card matches any of the others. It's not one of the obvious ones, so it may take some time. Steve B PS- Of course there's always the possibility that the card Todd posted is also faked, meaning there's someone capable of replacing a caption well enough to get past grading- something I consider possible but very difficult. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mind you Steve...the one Todd posted is NOT identical...look how wobbly the letters are in phil. am...that's kinda odd?!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, one of the differences.
Looking at the animation, the shape of the P is different too, but looks consistent with the one Todd showed. But the overall look of the caption is very similar. Nearly every T206 I look at in any detail has 2-3 different versions. Most slight enough that they can't be counted as variations, but different enough to see from even average scans. I think these two are probably a different run than the usual ones. Hard to believe there'd be two different Magies, but it looks that way. And most of the scans I have aren't clear enough to tell easily. Steve B |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd like to hear Ted Zs thoughts on this.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like the caption has been re-done. That's the impression that it gives anyways. It could be the scan I suppose, but I wouldn't go near it (even if I could afford it).
Mac |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Than pretend I am 100% sure one way or the other based on a scan.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The comparison Chris posted makes one of them look kind of messed up.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It didn't seem that hard to spot...but I guess it is worrisome. I think that if anybody cared about the actual integrity of the hobby, they would be forthcoming about the trail. If the same person bought it in the original auction, submitted it for grading, then consigned to Rick...there would be a cut and dry case. I hope Joe, Rick or the original seller of the unaltered card makes another appearance.
Mac |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll be sending all of my cards to CBA - "Chris Browne Authenticators" of Calgary (rats, customs forms). Great work Chris. Keep them honest.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD (2) 94 Finest Bskt Series 1 boxes $95 del. Compare BBCE $60 per box | brian29575 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 09-11-2013 08:48 AM |
1913 Fenway fan photos., Requesting park photos, to compare. | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 11 | 12-22-2010 08:40 AM |
How do grades compare between graders? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-21-2008 08:19 AM |
A few notes on the 183 card '19 Zeenut lot from Hunts & hoping to compare wantlists | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-31-2008 11:24 AM |
Who can you compare Derek Jeter going back to 1869. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 101 | 09-25-2006 03:06 PM |