![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was able to add this on the last night (Satchell Paige and Goose Tatum)
Last edited by bobfreedman; 11-10-2013 at 03:21 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice one Bob!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As always everyone's pickups are off the charts.... well I've been eyeing her from afar for quite awhile and I asked her to the dance several times in the past only to find out at the last minute that she was going with someone else....but this time I finally made it to the prom.
![]() ![]() Ricky Y |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ben, I'm still envious of you winning that photo.
I had great plans for it
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-30-2014 at 12:20 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think that is what they refer to as "feng shui"?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let's ruin that.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-30-2014 at 12:19 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Cobb photo is outstanding, but I am confused as to how it received a "Type 1" designation.
It is my understanding that a "Type 1" photo was made from the original negative, which is how I have used the term. However that particular print was made from a copy neg, which you can tell because of the white marks in the corners. Those white circular marks are where the original photo was tacked down while a mounted camera was used to take a photo of it to produce an additional negative. Sometimes you will see about a 1/4" wide white line where instead of a tack, they used as a long fastener to secure the original photo. I had a book at one time that showed the process. I am guessing based on the type of paper that it was printed at the time, just from a copy neg instead of the original. I don't have the book handy that describes how PSA determines "types" of photos, but I would think that it would be something other than a "type 1". Maybe there is no classification for a print made from a copy neg. Maybe they just assume that anything that is printed directly from a negative is "type 1". It seems like there should be some distinction though. I am not trying to rain on anybody's parade that has photos like this, as I have seen other similar ones that are described as "type 1" sold as such, I just don't understand how they get that designation.
__________________
Monthly consignment auctions of Sports Memorabilia, Antiques and Collectibles. www.scgaynor.com Ebay ID: Estate-Finders https://www.ebay.com/sch/estate-find...1&_ipg=&_from= Find my monthly auctions on auctionninja https://www.auctionninja.com/gaynors-fine-consignments/ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS/ FT: Heritage and More | varsitycollectibles | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 3 | 03-14-2013 10:15 AM |
Heritage Lot? | tiger8mush | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 05-06-2012 08:41 AM |
So, how'd we do in Heritage | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 10 | 10-24-2008 06:18 PM |
Heritage e99 Lot | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-06-2007 11:48 PM |
heritage | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-29-2005 11:38 AM |