![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Scott. The primary difference was the 9000 has a more modern LED light vs a cathode bulb type. The LED scanned much faster but more importantly the LED gave consistent colors where I was having issues with the 5600 as the light warmed up.
The LED element should outlast a bulb and use less power. Great for those Seattle granola types ![]()
__________________
T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 11-07-2013 at 04:46 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Fred, Chris. Arrives tomorrow, so looking forward to testing.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
bought a cannon 5600f based on what had been said on this site a few months ago. It takes great scans on flat items, slabs, and even some 3D items - cover open or closed. Only thing I haven't scanned is a magazine print. Thanks to all that posted.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
how did you get one for $60?
all on ebay are over $100 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott,
I got mine used. It came with the power cord, usb cable and the slide template. No software, but the Twain driver is available on Canon's website. Plus, I have Photoshop, so I really didn't need any of the bundled software, though the Toolbox software is available on Canon's site, too.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Epson v33 is a nice ccd scanner available for under $100
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a pretty good deal. I bought one for a friend.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search...rch=yes&sts=ta
__________________
Carlo Cella |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love the 9000f - as Chris said, very fast scans, plus I can scan negatives and slides. The software is somewhat complicated (to me anyway) but I think I have it figured out. Look for new, improved runscott scans soon.
Probably 3-4 times faster than the Epson it replaced, and much more reliable. Well worth the extra $70 or so.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've had one for nearly two years now and love it. Never a problem.
JimB ![]() ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a ways to go to get to be proficient with it....It seems all s/w is just a little bit different...picked this e121 up at lunch today...good enough to practice on. I am a sucker for centering though am not sure what I will do with it. Last one like this I picked up is the M116 Smoky Joe I kept
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why did I wait so long to get a proper scanner? Loving my CanoScan 9000F! | jb217676 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 07-15-2014 06:42 PM |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |