![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
On occasion, yes. If it's after the item sold, when they pull the listing they also send the buyer a boilerplate notice basically telling them not to complete the transaction but not really giving any specific details.
In this case, I only get the "broken link" message when I click on the original posted link. I don't know if it's because the item was pulled, or whatever it is that often causes problems with links posted here on the board to eBay items.
__________________
Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. Last edited by thecatspajamas; 11-07-2013 at 09:59 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I googled it and it came up. Is that the one for 535.00 dollars. If it is it doesn't look good to me. Why is the clarity of it so bad? Someone can post it from google.
. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would love to know if someone on the board got it!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe the eBay sale did indeed go through...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-Basebal...#ht_254wt_1141 Below is a prior example from REA, for comparison... IMO the REA example is much crisper/clearer than the one on ebay. Perhaps the seller's camera lens was just really dirty! http://bid.robertedwardauctions.com/...x?itemid=14570 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just to play "Devil's Advocate", the clarity on the ebay example could be lots worse, as a result of the heavy resotoration.
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I remember that piece from within the last couple weeks.....I put the brakes on long enough to give it a once over...Based on the photos the front looked like it could be real...but then I recall when I looked at the back I started laughing...the front was all fatigued...but the back looked new...I gave it a look over and was out of there as fast as I came in...
__________________
Do you read Sports Antique of the Week? Check it out on my site SportsAntiques.com/Antique of the Week ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
U say based on the photos it looked like it could be real so u were looking at photos of it, or the actual piece in your hands? then u say u were out of there as fast as you came in? in where? Last edited by Shoeless Moe; 11-07-2013 at 12:41 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carlton - Was it at one time being represented and offered without mention of the restoration because he fully disclosed the restoration and rebacking on ebay.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not know whether it is real or a reproduction. Like J Gallo said on the other side, I too have never seen these come up b4, so if they were faked usually you would see a couple, however that being said this very well could have been a 1 and done repro by someone.
The seller is 100% genuine and a good guy. He offered me a full refund if it turns out to not be real. So that led me to take a chance, not to mention the extensive research he did. First he like us Googled it and found the only other one at REA a few years ago, so he contacted them. They could not make a determination over the emailed pix and said they would need to see it in person or he should take it to a professional art restoration service and see if they could determine. Well he did that, and the restoration company told him it matched printing methods and die cuts of the era. REA recommended to him to get it restored, which he did. So.......unless the restoration company, which is Phoenix Art Restoration in Seattle Washington, which is Better Business Bureau accredited is wrong, which I guess is always possible, I think it could be real, and was definitely worth the gamble. I should get it Tues or Weds and will attempt to determine on my own, but if I can't there is the Chicago Sports Show in town, the following week, and I know Heritage and a few others will be there, I will show it to them. He is including all the Phoenix Art Restoration paperwork, and b4 and after pix......so....we'll see. Last edited by Shoeless Moe; 11-09-2013 at 08:58 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am guessing the restoration cost more than what he got on ebay
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was thinking the same... not much room for profit there.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1913 National Game Joe Jackson PSA 8 | Peter_Spaeth | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 09-14-2013 07:48 AM |
FS: 1913 Tom Barker Game Joe Jackson PSA 6 | simas7173 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 09-19-2009 09:53 AM |
1913 Tom Barker Game Joe Jackson PSA 8 | Peter_Spaeth | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-01-2009 02:32 PM |
Shoeless Joe Jackson signed, or did Joe's wife sign for him? | tcrowntom | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 06-07-2009 09:30 AM |
1913 Tom Barker Game Joe Jackson For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 20 | 02-10-2008 09:58 PM |