Show Your Henry Yee Winnings

[HRBAKER]

Adam,

I have made many prints from color slides at Costco actually and never had a slide damaged.

Here are examples of a couple of prints that I have made there. These are 5x7s with a border and matte finish. I have never tried a real large print. I am not sure what kind of resolution you might lose.

[packs]

Joe D in 1937

[Tigerden]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

Adam,

I have made many prints from color slides at Costco actually and never had a slide damaged.

Here are examples of a couple of prints that I have made there. These are 5x7s with a border and matte finish. I have never tried a real large print. I am not sure what kind of resolution you might lose.

Jeff Thanks for the info. It really puts me at ease. I am glad you have never had any problems. I want to go with a 5 x 7 and also use the border matte finish. They look great. Adam

[Lordstan]

Finally.
So I was finally able to pull down one of Lou from Henry. I love the human shots.

Lou and his mom.

[Lordstan]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

Adam,

I have made many prints from color slides at Costco actually and never had a slide damaged.

Here are examples of a couple of prints that I have made there. These are 5x7s with a border and matte finish. I have never tried a real large print. I am not sure what kind of resolution you might lose.

Jeff,
You shouldn't lose any detail enlarging from a slide transparency. Even though it's small, a transparency should be the same quality as a negative. If the picture itself is sharp, you be able to blown it up huge, like you would a film negative.
Great pic of Maris, BTW. I think he was under-appreciated.

Best,
Mark

[repsher]

I was only able to land a couple of cheap George Burke negatives of Mickey Cochrane and Early Wynn. If I had landed everything I bid on I'd probably be divorced by now.

Hey Lance - I'm just noticing now that I'm not seeing the usual Burke/Brace catalog markings on these negatives. What are your thoughts about that?

[thecatspajamas]

Originally Posted by repsher

I was only able to land a couple of cheap George Burke negatives of Mickey Cochrane and Early Wynn. If I had landed everything I bid on I'd probably be divorced by now.

Hey Lance - I'm just noticing now that I'm not seeing the usual Burke/Brace catalog markings on these negatives. What are your thoughts about that?

Of the Burke negatives that I've handled, many had the file coding, but there were a good number that did not. The presence of the coding is a good indicator that the photo was shot by Burke or Brace, but the absence of it does not preclude it from being their work. My guess, and this is just a guess, would be that the negatives without coding weren't the ones he pulled for producing prints of those players when they were requested. If the negative got filed in that player's folder (or envelope, or whatever he used) and was never pulled out to make a print, no need to identify which folder it should be returned to. Again though, that's just conjecture.

[GKreindler]

Here's my one win thus far:



This is gonna make for one hell of a painting. Or MANY paintings, even.

Color me excited. These Newman negatives are absolutely incredible.

Graig

[horzverti]

That fantastic Phillies photo has your name written all over it. It was entrapment...you had to buy it!

[Scott Garner]

Originally Posted by GKreindler

Here's my one win thus far:



This is gonna make for one hell of a painting. Or MANY paintings, even.

Color me excited. These Newman negatives are absolutely incredible.

Graig

Graig,

Terrific photo! Who is on the mound for the Phillies?

[roarfrom34]

Originally Posted by Scott Garner

Graig,

Terrific photo! Who is on the mound for the Phillies?

looks like Rick Wise; would be fun to do some investigative work to determine the actual date of the game

great photo!