A bath for Mr. Bresnahan?

drmondobueno · #1 10-23-2013, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bridwell

It could be risky to soak this one. The slight paper loss on the front and the rough edges could get worse if soaked. It looks to me like it has already been soaked once. Doing it further is probably not going to help.

+1

brob28 · #2 10-24-2013, 06:18 AM

Thanks for all the input guys, I appreciate it. Ron, (or anyone) was just wondering what makes you think the card has been soaked already? I don't mind if it has been, but would love to learn more.

Thanks guys,

T206Collector · #3 10-24-2013, 07:17 AM

There is no reason to soak this card. You can tell it may have been exposed to moisture by the way the card's edges look -- somewhat bloated and frayed.

I do not think much harm would come with a minute water soaking followed by a press between two sheets of printer paper, under a stack of books (how I have done it in the past). But you are not going to make it look any cleaner.

steve B · #4 10-24-2013, 09:11 AM

I'd leave it alone as well.

The front could possibly take a light surface cleaning, but the back would be damaged by most attempts since the cardboard is porous. The fronts are coated for printing, but the backs aren't.

Once cleaned on the front you'd have a mismatch between front and back that would look odd.

Here's about as far as a light surface cleaning can get.
Before, grubby front from probably decades in a paper bag in an attic. With another card on top of about half of it. But the back was very clean. (SC 350-460 F25)

After, Just a light cleaning with water and a q-tip. I thought I might have wrecked it, but the light area on the neck is the actual color. I should have done a bit more, but I stopped and didn't compare it to online scans.
The surface still holds some dirt in the usually invisible cracks in the surface coating.
And yes, I was very surprised at the grade. I'd hoped for a 40.
And no, I'm not cracking it out to finish the cleaning. I don't think it would benefit much, and going further is both risky and borderline inappropriate.

Steve B

Edwolf1963 · #5 10-24-2013, 03:27 PM

I agree with all previously - I would leave that one alone. I have had mixed results depending on the card stock and issues that pertained. Glue, pencil - fairly easy. Pen, tar, deeper stains like caramel or oils from CJ - more difficult.

As an example - attached are some backs of low end CJ's (combo of 14's and 15's) recently won. On the left (black background) before, to the right is after. Most of the glue and scrap book paper came out, but as you can see it created paper-loss as well on a couple. Obviously the intent isn't for grade bump as much as just eye-appeal and appreciation of the card as close to original as possible (IMO). Some clearly went well (Hummel), some not so much (Archer) - the Archer was too far gone w/all the glue and scrap book paper from the book it was in. Nothing but water and a Q-Tip. I heat the water as I feel that helps loosen foreign stains/materials better. Some use/recommend distilled water, I've been OK with tap.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
1914 CJ Mathewson Receives a Bath Courtesy of Legendary	calvindog	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	87	08-15-2013 06:03 PM
Cool or unusual bath residue	tschock	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	0	06-09-2013 05:36 PM
Here's a Jewish pic- 1912 Cook's Bath's team	Archive	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	4	03-30-2008 11:17 AM
Advice on giving my keefe a bath!	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	9	09-21-2007 05:25 PM
The $1,300 bath - can someone explain this?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	11	11-07-2005 01:23 PM