 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
10-11-2013, 03:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
My guess is that they aren't stating this on every flip, but instead flips that may contain a year that was written by the player, and are including it to parlay any doubts about the validity of the autograph due to the year it was signed. It is a card from 1909, so it's understandable. I could be wrong, but that was my thought on it when I first saw this card...
__________________
. Looking for: T205 Cubs in AB, Cycle, Sov, HLC. & E91A Cubs, T206 Cubs master set, T3 Cubs 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT-Authentic Trimmed or Authentic Restored | Taxman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-28-2012 09:31 AM |
| Pre-war cards: SGC 10 vs SGC Authentic or PSA 1 vs. PSA Authentic | tbob | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 08-15-2012 04:24 PM |
| Authentic/Altered vs Authentic/Beaten Cards | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-20-2010 10:17 PM |
| Were These Authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-26-2008 11:37 AM |
| Why authentic ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-22-2005 03:58 PM |
Threaded Mode