![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
the graders don't need a ruler or magnifying glass to see the $50 bill taped to the back of the previously graded PSA 7 card I just submitted in order to bump it to a PSA 9.
Great news! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bottom line - Grading is still SUBJECTIVE....
How the heck can anyone expect to see consistency in grading if people are to rely on the "naked eye". We've seen enough examples of paper loss being missed and other issues not caught during grading. I've seen enough PSA graded cards graded with an OC qualifier that had better centering than cards without the OC qualifier. Oh, that's right, it's the "naked eye" thing. The numerical grading system is bull $hit. I still think it's funny that there are people that care more about a numerical grade assigned to a card than they actually care about the card. I see a good purpose for TPG companies but assigning numerical grades shouldn't be a part of it. The label should indicate AUTH (authentic) and if the card was altered then place that information (ALT) on the label and let the purchaser figure out the rest. If the TPG companies did this then nobody would be bashing them for the mistakes they're being paid not to make.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is about as "revealing" as the Joey P thread!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The half grades recently employed by PSA required the purchase of a new grading wheel. Accurate division by two (2) is required to determine the grade.
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 05-05-2016 at 08:54 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
frank...does this mean psa has changed their scale...to include "11" for those really really "loud" cards!?!?!??!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Peter,
You are not a PSA grader. 11 divided by 2 = 5.5 EX+ We are forwarding your application to CSA. ![]() And before anyone asks, 1 divided by 2 = Authentic
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 09-29-2013 at 07:31 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do people even know what subjective vs objective mean? TPGs are obviously human like referees but they are a neutral third party between the buyer and seller.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pete, only Chuck Norris's cards are 11's...
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 09-29-2013 at 02:24 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always thought that the "P" in PSA stood for Punxsutawny. I figured grading is what Phil does the rest of the year. I mean, is it a coincidence that they don't accept submissions on Feb 2?
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always thought that the "P" in PSA stood for Punxsutawny. I figured grading is what Phil does the rest of the year. Do they accept submissions on February 2nd?
![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good on PSA for finding a way to capatilize on the hobby. However, these statements only add validity to the "Authentic" or "Altered" concept.
Also, I would prefer an objective grader anyday. My 3 year old can subjectively grade a card.
__________________
"Chicago Cubs fans are 90% scar tissue". -GFW |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Chuck Norris will kick your ass...........
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 214/520 : 40.84% |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
simple solution, if you simply don't like it, then don't buy or use TPA's
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are you Smarter than an SGC Grader? Revealed. | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 05-07-2013 04:59 PM |
Australian Baseball cards...information revealed... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-03-2007 12:29 AM |
Source of my phony Wagner, revealed to me by Mike McGrail | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-06-2005 03:55 PM |
The T207 Printing Process | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 01-17-2003 01:06 PM |
The Printing Process | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2001 10:25 PM |