![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sign your name on the front (or back) of a 1986 Topps Don Mattingly and -- voila! -- assuming you don't do it again, it's unique. Like Ryan said, not sure that was the original intent of the thread. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great Deacon White card, Joe.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is a card that is unique in a certain sense - its provenance. It is from the estate of King Kelly's teammate, Billy Sunday. So if the image itself is not unique, at least the provenance is.
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great image of King, Jamie.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great card, Jamie...I love that one...but with that rationale...every card that's no longer in it's original packaging is unique?!?!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay, it is an admittedly weak rationale, but I wanted to post the card.
![]() Scientifically speaking, I suppose every card is unique since all cards hold a slightly different molecular composition. So maybe provenance is a weak rationale, but not so bad as the scientific rationale of molecular differentiality? Does finding an even potentially worse rationale help support my other, admittedly weak excuse for posting in the first place? ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
------------------------------------------------------ illustration * design * posters www.zenpop.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That mantle's awesome! Great disguise!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1869 Cincinnati Redstockings Photo Disc with George & Harry Wright
1880's Taber Cabinet Alexander Cartwright 1950's Signed Government PC George Weiss 1939 Santurce Crabbers PC with Josh Gibson 1911 Chicago American Giants PC with Rube Foster & Pete Hill 1925 St. Louis Stars PC with Willie Wells 1922 Cuban Stars PC with Alex Pompez Last edited by triwak; 09-19-2013 at 12:47 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great stuff, Ken!
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow Ken...WOW!!
I hope a second one of each of those cards surfaces...for my sake!!
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think my Ryan might've come from the same collection..
![]() Last edited by novakjr; 09-20-2013 at 04:25 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyways, here's my lone legit response...
I'd assume there are a bunch of these, but I've done a ton of looking, and I've never seen another on the net.. Hoping one of you guys out there can burst my bubble.. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you ever find another, I'd happily buy your lower conditioned one!!!
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
![]() |
|
|