![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
They need to call this the "Lipstick Set" |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Really, eh? The faces are just creepy looking.
![]()
__________________
Successful transactions with the-illini, Kawika, irishdenny, iwantitiwinit, AddieJoss. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My personal pick
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1969 Topps nuff said.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1951 Berk Ross.
A disgraceful excuse for a baseball card. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Al, I have to agree. If we're talking pre-war or vintage, the W515 gets my vote. Too bad, because there's some really great players available in it.
Of course, even that looks beautiful compared to some of the uninspired stuff that came out in the early 90s. Obnoxious, loud colors were all over the place. Thankfully, I'd stopped collecting by then.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think for pre-war the strip card sets W515, W551, etc. are pretty bad. They look like they were drawn by a child -- the likeness is questionable on some of them. Top that off with the fact that many are blank back and were actually cut by children.
Worst set of all time, though, has to be the yellow 1990 Score. Oh wait, the 1981 Fleer was pretty awful with the out-of-focus photographs. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Really? The 1969 Topps issue is my favorite set from the '60s. Gorgeous set, in my opinion of course.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not my favorite, but I think 69 Topps is a damn good set.
__________________
T206-520/524 T205-209/221 T207-68/200 T213-2 -65/185 E90-1 102/120 Topps 1954,1959,1964 Bowman 1954 complete Deals competed with: jb217676, marcdelpercio, dog*dirt, srs1a, KennyCole, ullmandds, RCMcKenzie, edhans, dboneesq, mybuddyinc, nineunder71, uke, T206kid, & more Last edited by deadballfreaK; 09-10-2013 at 10:20 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
T206-520/524 T205-209/221 T207-68/200 T213-2 -65/185 E90-1 102/120 Topps 1954,1959,1964 Bowman 1954 complete Deals competed with: jb217676, marcdelpercio, dog*dirt, srs1a, KennyCole, ullmandds, RCMcKenzie, edhans, dboneesq, mybuddyinc, nineunder71, uke, T206kid, & more |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As promised, here are scans of my set, and then cards that I have multiples. As can be seen, this issue comes with a lot of color and design variations (eat your heart out T206 freak lovers!).
I especially like the squiggly background lines variations on the Veach and Cadore...it makes these players seem incredibly psychotic. And the Griffith card always reminded me of Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange. Although I concede that the W9316 set is at or near the top of the ugly list, I still can't resist them. I must have absolutely no taste. Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 09-10-2013 at 10:56 PM. Reason: Gettin' my Mics straight |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those are some fugly cards!
![]() Talk about lipstick on a pig. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ugliest Postwar Baseball Cards of All Time | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 12-14-2012 06:48 PM |
Ugliest Card Ever | paul | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 03-22-2011 07:00 AM |
What is the UGLIEST... | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-23-2010 06:24 AM |
The Ugliest Pre-War Set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 06-02-2007 01:15 PM |
Ugliest set ever | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-22-2003 10:51 PM |