 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20
08-27-2013, 08:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Mark, Agreed
Type 3 designation for composite photos is not the best designation - as it implies that there are two levels better, when in fact, this is not the case. Composite photos such as this are the top form of the piece. In the art world, these would be considered the original work of the artist (which is defined as work done by the artist and/or at the artist's direction by others). Type 3 composite photos are similar to Type 1 photos in that they are both the original work of the photographer/artist. I might call the them "Type 1 - Composite" as they need to be differentiated from regular Type I, but not be defined as less than a Type 1. Last edited by BigJJ; 08-27-2013 at 08:37 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Memory Lane Auction | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-09-2011 07:42 AM |
| Memory Lane Auction.... | illini805 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 08-10-2009 05:30 PM |
| Memory Lane auction? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-28-2009 04:15 PM |
| Memory Lane Pick-Ups | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-14-2008 05:56 PM |
| Memory Lane Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-17-2007 09:35 AM |
Threaded Mode