![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for clarifying. I should have added that I was curious in re: to T-205's/206's since I've been dabbling in those recently. Wonder why the strip cards get a numerical? I figured the TPG's would be pretty consistent regardless of issue, e.g. "T" cards, Bowman's, Topps, etc. Again ... I'm kinda' new to SGC and a little more familiar with PSA only because they have been around longer and I know about their qualifiers. For what its worth ... I really like the "T" cards in the SGC holders. They just look good in black :-)
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
are "A" authentic SGC & PSA cards gaining momentum with collectors/dealers | Thrill-of-the-Hunt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 08-02-2010 07:36 PM |
Novice question: PSA "Authentic" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-26-2007 02:28 PM |
Where is the line between a "1" and "Authentic"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-02-2006 04:21 PM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
GAI dropping the "authentic" grading classification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-23-2005 08:31 AM |