Anyone know the dealer in this photo?

[whiteymet]

Hey Guys, sorry for starting ALL THIS!! I just asked an innocent question!!

Got two possible names of the dealer from guys here, but neither show up on the list of dealers at the National.

Could he have been helping out a listed dealer?

Fred

[Peter_Spaeth]

Shouldn't Greg's PM to Murcerfan remain private? I am sure he sent it with the expectation of privacy.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Shouldn't Greg's PM to Murcerfan remain private? I am sure he sent it with the expectation of privacy.

Generally speaking yes. But there have been a few posted before. And there is a rule pertaining to my action....

"**Since there are an unlimited amount of unforeseeable issues that can arise on the board, the moderator may make any decision he feels is in the best interest of Net54baseball, regardless of any written or oral rules."


Call it the catch 22, Peter.
.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

Generally speaking yes. But there have been a few posted before. And there is a rule pertaining to my action....

"**Since there are an unlimited amount of unforeseeable issues that can arise on the board, the moderator may make any decision he feels is in the best interest of Net54baseball, regardless of any written or oral rules."


Call it the catch 22, Peter.
.

And how was publishing Greg's PM to Murcerfan, which you saw only by a fortuity, in the interest of the Board?

[bigwinnerx]

Leon's point is that tipsy replied to the PM email instead of the PM, and that note goes to a catch-all inbox. And that's how Leon saw it. He's not NSAing PMs.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by bigwinnerx

Leon's point is that tipsy replied to the PM email instead of the PM, and that note goes to a catch-all inbox. And that's how Leon saw it. He's not NSAing PMs.

Not the point. Leon got it because Murcerfan made a mistake, but nonetheless in my opinion Leon should not have published it to the whole Board. How was it in the interest of the Board to do so?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Not the point. Leon got it because Murcerfan made a mistake, but nonetheless in my opinion Leon should not have published it to the whole Board. How was it in the interest of the Board to do so?

That is your opinion Peter. And you are entitled to it. I can't see PMs unless people respond to the email they get. Those emails say IN 2 DIFFERENT places not to respond to them. If an idiot drunk responds to one and I see it, it's not my fault. I posted it because I didn't think it was funny. Maybe you do, I don't.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

That is your opinion Peter. And you are entitled to it. I can't see PMs unless people respond to the email they get. Those emails say IN 2 DIFFERENT places not to respond to them. If an idiot drunk responds to one and I see it, it's not my fault. I posted it because I didn't think it was funny. Maybe you do, I don't.

I never said it was your fault that you saw it. Don't put up a red herring. I am questioning how it was in the interest of the Board to publish it when you know Greg sent it expecting it to be private.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I never said it was your fault that you saw it. Don't put up a red herring. I am questioning how it was in the interest of the Board to publish it when you know Greg sent it expecting it to be private.

Question all you want to Peter. I posted it because I didn't think it was funny. My guess is that most of the other members didn't think so either. As far as it being in the best interest of the board, I thought others would like to know how Greg thinks. So I posted it. I have already got one email from someone commenting on the subject. And they and I agree. It wasn't funny.

BTW, you guys can keep commenting if you want to. The drunk is gone and I am most likely not commenting anymore in this thread. I would rather move on to positive stuff.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

That is your opinion Peter. And you are entitled to it. I can't see PMs unless people respond to the email they get. Those emails say IN 2 DIFFERENT places not to respond to them. If an idiot drunk responds to one and I see it, it's not my fault. I posted it because I didn't think it was funny. Maybe you do, I don't.

I think you posted it because you were pissed that in a PM you happened to see, Greg thought a jab at you was funny. I don't think being pissed is a good reason for a moderator to post a PM. Just my opinion.