Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
Sean,
Do you watch any real life detective shows? Think of it like this. When an investigator asks a suspect a question, doesn't the investigator already know the answer (and have the proof) before he even asks the question? Sure he does. All, he's doing is giving the supsect a chance to answer honestly. If he lies, then he incriminates himself even more. Why would I tell what I know at this point? I want to hear an explanation and if that explanation contradicts what I know, then I have the proof to pop him with a lie.
|
exactly. +1.
i actually read 38 pages of the other thread. i couldn't take any more. im glad this got regrouped into an easier to follow consolidated thread as there were like 20 some pages of pure fluff.
kevin