![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Buy the card, not the slab"
__________________
T206 gallery |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This looks like a very recent submission, so definitely within the era of PSA qualifiers. Regardless of anyone's subjective opinion.. or that old oft used slogan.. it looks like a PSA grader considered this card an unqualfied 8.
Personally, I wish all cards used something like the old BVG (or BGS?) system where there were 3 criteria and it gave you a number for each. It would be nice if a couple other things like image quality, registration, etc could be added to a similar stye system and be printed on the back of a flip... or maybe on a registry filed with a high resolution scan under each card's s/n. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I couldn't disagree more. Qualifiers are the biggest pile of horse s#%t when it comes to PSA. If its off centered, stained, miscut, or has a print defect, then grade accordingly. These are all things that detract from a cards' grade or condition. No different than creases or rounded corners. Where is the creases qualifier?
I'm fine with the grade of 8. It is at least 70/30. Here is the standard from PSA NM-MT 8: Near Mint-Mint A PSA NM-MT 8 is a super high-end card that appears Mint 9 at first glance, but upon closer inspection, the card can exhibit the following: a very slight wax stain on reverse, slightest fraying at one or two corners, a minor printing imperfection, and/or slightly off-white borders. Centering must be approximately 65/35 to 70/30 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the reverse.
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
with the grade
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My experience has been that unloading a PSA 6 is much easier than moving a PSA 8 (OC) any day of the week. Since I only buy PSA slabs for resale to the kool aid drinkers - it works out for me.
Of course you can always eliminate the happy horsesh*t from PSA by simply changing the address on your submissions from Newport Beach, CA to Bound Brook, NJ
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 214/520 : 40.84% |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
My point is, wouldn't it have been a better and more honest system if the TPG's included obvious flaws like O/C on all cards from the beginning?? Eliminating the option of receiving a lesser grade if the card's flaws were completely ignored would give a consistency to the system that just doesn't exist in its current state. A card that's an 8, but off center, would always get an 8 O/C and a card that's a true 8 would get an 8. In other words, it would reflect the unbiased reality of the card in question. The Clemente I posted here is just one quick example. It's obviously off centered both ways - top to bottom and side to side - yet there's no mention of it anywhere. It's too late to put the Genie back in the bottle, but I think it would've been a much better and realistic system if they noted all qualifiers on the label without allowing you to opt your card out for a lower number grade.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The overwhelming majority of buyers are investors registry chasers and people
that think they have knowledge, will always buy the slab 1st! true collectors, (and there is some here) still buy ungraded cards, as for the qualifiers in slabs, it remains the dumbest thing that a grading company could have!! however PSA is the top grading company and they don't even judge & grade cards by there true integrity, go figure. Last edited by pepis; 08-27-2013 at 04:09 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Removing qualifiers for OC is somewhat persuasive to me although I don't completely agree. However, how about the qualifier for MK (marks)? Many marks on cards are not nearly so obvious.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TIM DUNCAN Graded LOT ( 52 GRADED CARDS ) SGC 96 / Spurs / All 52 Cards Graded ! | DinoPro | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 06-25-2012 05:12 AM |
Cards Added Prices Lowered Random PSA graded cards fs | cobblove | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 9 | 02-17-2010 11:44 PM |
Graded T206's, E90-2, W514, strip cards, and Misc. cards.... | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 10-13-2008 10:04 AM |
N19 Pirates, Golf Cards, Graded Baseball Cards, Catalogs Ending Monday Night | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-18-2008 10:02 AM |
Graded and non-graded Tattoo Orbits and other cards now on ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 05-23-2007 08:35 PM |