 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
08-20-2013, 06:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
55 Elliott
John---SCD's Standard Catalog lists it as a variation. They list 3 of the 4 in the listing you posted. They do not list the partially missing copyright version. I have the 3 involving the present , missing or partially missing 3. I think it is a recurring expanding print defect, but it is listed as a variation by SCD and has recognition in the hobby among variant collectors. Here is another 56 variant, also recognized in SCD involving the i in the Sullivan aoto
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are ANY of these legit? | Deertick | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 08-24-2012 01:18 PM |
| Is the Nodgrass considered a legit variation? | Piratedogcardshows | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-12-2012 05:25 AM |
| T206 Dahlen No Red - Legit Variation? | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-28-2010 09:36 PM |
| Legit or... | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 10-27-2008 08:53 PM |
| Can anyone tell me if this is legit? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-11-2002 09:12 PM |
Threaded Mode