![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very cool list of HOF RC's.
Thanks for posting. I agree with all of the lists pretty much but I think 53 is tougher than 57 IMO. Some pretty big ones like Mantle and Mays second cards, Paige, etc. then the high numbers including Podres and Gilliam RC's.
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I may have undervalued the 53s. I have a small chunk of them, but nothing of note and have not actively pursued them with any type of focus. I ranked by lack of HOF RC's, low number of cards, and low number of stars. The Mays & Mantle are classics and spendy for sure...but I think what I didn't consider is just how expensive those high numbers are. After looking around, I think you have a point...
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rank These Cards? Thanks. | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2013 11:49 AM |
Rank your favorite sets? (eye appeal) | asphaltman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-27-2011 08:17 PM |
1933 Goudey Set For Sale - PSA Rank #16 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2008 12:22 PM |
Rank these Matty cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 08-31-2007 08:37 PM |
prewar set value increases, rank them? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-11-2006 09:50 PM |