Ruth Ball on Ebay 1 yes 1 no

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by BrandonG

The ball is also a 1949-1951 model.

Awright Mike G,, way to go, coming in third in a contest with PSA and JSA.
Speaks highly of you.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by RichardSimon

Awright Mike G,, way to go, coming in third in a contest with PSA and JSA.
Speaks highly of you.

I can remember buying items with his authentication, with complete confidence, back when JSA was just a twinkle in the forgers' eyes.

It's really a shame that TPA's, rather than moving forward and reaching their potential, have totally failed us.

[shelly]

Originally Posted by Runscott

I can remember buying items with his authentication, with complete confidence, back when JSA was just a twinkle in the forgers' eyes.

It's really a shame that TPA's, rather than moving forward and reaching their potential, have totally failed us.

When you already have people that believe what you say know matter what. Why would you upgrade. Infact with there hireing of god knows how many people that have no idea of what they are doing just proves that.
If they really cared dont you think the first thing they should do is hire a ball expert so they know at least it is from the same era as the signiture. They are Joke and so is M G who has know idea what he is doing. When operation bull pen was going on he had more garbage in his SCD auctions than most of the othe houses.

[Runscott]

Shelly, have you seen the inside front cover of Heritage's recent 'Seeking Consigners' booklet? It should give everyone a clue as to why the various autograph world relationships are working so well.