 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31
07-31-2013, 09:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Let me just say one more thing before I wrap this up, as I'm flying out tomorrow and will be occupied with other stuff like actually looking at baseball cards:
Mike Dorgan is numbered 132 by CSGB. No cards that aren't Dorgan are numbered 132. No Dorgan cards are numbered anything other than 132. If that's the case, what's the purpose of the number 132? Why not just call it "Dorgan"? Can you see how those numbers are completely useless? The only reason why you're thinking of them is because they are already there... but they have no practical application. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An Old Judge question.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-26-2007 06:12 PM |
| old judge question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-20-2006 10:51 PM |
| Another Old Judge question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-20-2006 02:15 PM |
| Old Judge/PSA question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-13-2005 01:54 PM |
| old judge question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-25-2002 08:51 PM |
Threaded Mode