Question on T206 Sheet Layouts - RE: Mastro Wagner Card

[T206Collector]

This has been discussed and debated a lot on here. If I recall, the theory is that the sheet was not a final sheet, but a proof of some sort, which is supported by the colors on certain of the players shown being somewhat different than their normal T206 cards.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by T206Collector

This has been discussed and debated a lot on here. If I recall, the theory is that the sheet was not a final sheet, but a proof of some sort, which is supported by the colors on certain of the players shown being somewhat different than their normal T206 cards.

Which players?

[T206Collector]

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=123958

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

I was confused about the original topic. I have mentioned several times about contacting the guy who sold Mastro "The Card." I asked if anyone had spoken to him or had any information on the other cards that Mastro purchased. Nobody ever responded to those posts.

[wolf441]

Just to clarify, my initial post is in relation to the "Gretzky" Wagner that Mastro supposedly bought from a dealer that cut it from a complete uncut sheet and then trimmed to get the PSA 8 rating. I was not referring to the 5 card "test proof" strip that Barry Halper once owned. I have my doubts about any connection of that strip to the layout of the original sheets.

[Jlighter]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

I was confused about the original topic. I have mentioned several times about contacting the guy who sold Mastro "The Card." I asked if anyone had spoken to him or had any information on the other cards that Mastro purchased. Nobody ever responded to those posts.

In The Card, the original owner claims that he wants to write a book and does not want to release the photos to the general public.

[deadballfreaK]

I find the 206 layout/printing topic fascinating. I have seen the 4 to 1 ratio for single/double name misprints and it certainly seems that single names predominate. But has anyone ever looked at all the cards that are fat on top and have no second name? I have seen a lot of them. These have to be on the top row, right? Seems like too many to be on a sheet with many vertical rows.

[Craig M]

Hi Steve,

Threads such as this one are so very interesting and I am always curious why they do not pick up steam.

Your post has so many unanswered questions and it is fun just to ponder.

For starters, I am almost 99.9% sure that a partial or full uncut T206 sheet does exist. This is a bold statement but one I am convinced of. You ask then, where is it? It is with the gentleman that does not post to this site but reads the mail here on a daily basis. It is a gentleman that could care less about money because he has more than he knows what to do with.

You ask then, why doesn't he show the world?

Now that wouldn't be much fun would it. What then would us T206 guys do with our time instead of trying to piece a sheet together.

I am one of those that is trying to do this by selecting a Sweet Cap Series, working outer borders on inward.

My collection of T206's with the Factory #30 anomalies have grown and given me clues as to who sits on the bottom row. I even have acquired a T206 with an anomaly that sits in the right border.

The interesting part about this is that you do not need to own a single T206, to be piecing a sheet(s) together; you simply can search the web for scans and pics of front and reverse; saving them to your hard drive and categorizing them. A time consuming but cheap way to work on piecing a sheet together.

Regards kind sir,

Craig