![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would send it to Beckett, since as David said, they'll probably want to keep it in the same grade. Since the raw card reviews are in a Card Saver however, they can be damaged if they are dropped, something falls on the card, etc. It's probably more of a general disclaimer that they can't guarantee the original grade on the card. Still to protect yourself, you can probably still submit the card as a crossover with the minimum grade as the grade on the card. If it doesn't crossover to Beckett, it probably won't cross to PSA since Beckett would already be giving it the benefit of the doubt as discussed before. Then, I'd just sell the card in the raw card review holder.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have submitted several raw graded cards and either received the raw grade or a higher grade, never lower. I'm pretty sure the only reason Beckett will not guarantee the same grade is the possibility of damage from the time between raw grade and BVG submission. As stated before, not honoring raw grades would be a terrible way to promote your raw grading service. I'd send it to Beckett for sure.
BTW- submitted a raw graded 1951 bowman Mantle at a 3.5, came back a slabbed 4.0!
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby Last edited by chipperhank44; 07-14-2013 at 06:46 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
why do you need it at the same grade? its exactly the same card no matter what 'number' they give it.
are you collecting cards or collecting numbers? i have the number 5 for sale at a 20% discount and it is graded a Cobb. the numbers don't mean anything. the card is going to be in the exact same shape is was previously. It's called CARD collecting. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The number attached to a card helps determine its market value. Not everyone's a purist, money plays a role. Number and holder collectors play their part in the hobby.
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
For my personal collection, I follow this line of thinking myself. I do admit to being sucked into the graded card game a lot more the last year and a half though. If it's a card that I have marked for trade/sale in the future, almost have to pursue graded cards. Becomes a money thing ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the uniformity of having ALL cards in a particular set slabbed by the same TPG. For most people I would say money does come in to play somewhere along the line. If you are "well heeled" purist than probably not so much. For the rest of us tho - I would prefer to know exactly what I have (as verified by TPG) just in case I ever need/want to market the little cardboard pictures of baseball men.
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 212/520 : 40.6% |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another Grading Question | xdrx | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-07-2011 09:44 PM |
Grading Question... | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-11-2011 01:56 PM |
SGC Grading Question | e107collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-30-2010 08:03 PM |
SGC Grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-27-2008 08:30 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |