![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How would that be proof that they don't grade the card as what it really is? Beckett is a much tougher grader than PSA is when it comes to modern cards. That is why they command a premium over PSA.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You know, I used to hear that Beckett was much tougher then PSA but
I really don't know. I have a friend that got a card back from PSA as trimmed and guess what Beckett graded it. I know on OPC cards that Beckett and SGC will grade cards that have been "smoothed" and PSA won't. I think personally, its who you like best. I am in the PSA registry and so I don't buy BGS or SGC anymore. Got burnt on buying to crossover on some OPC cards. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just to add a bit of fuel to this fire - I have been burnt many times trying to cross PSA & BGS cards to SGC........
I only collect vintage and I feel like SGC does a great job with the best customer service in the industry AND they have the best looking slab - bar none - but if I were to slab anything modern - I would go with BGS. Here again the main motivation would be to try and hit the elusive BGS 10 which is pretty much like winning the lottery. (IMHO) ![]()
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 216/520 : 41.22% |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SGC is the best all around in my opinion in terms of trust, consistency and protection vs aesthetics. With that said, I own slabs of all three.
My personal preference: SGC: Pre-war and vintage PSA: Modern Beckett: Will accept on modern cards if the card is difficult to come by, but really prefer PSA for modern. Will accept on vintage and pre-war cards, but not my first choice. My two cents.
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do a mixture of collecting current as well as vintage issues. For current cards go BGS, especially with rookie cards, autographs, and Bowman issues. For older items you can't go wrong with PSA. Pre-war SGC is your choice. Having said all that, I recently graded some Mike Trout 2011 rookie cards with PSA, came back 10's, and realized some nice prices.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anybody attempted / had any success crossing PSA 10s to BGS 10s?
__________________
-Shaun Currently seeking Jackie Robinson cards |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it would be PSA 10 to BGS 9.5. Beckett 10 is Pristine which is 1 step up from Gm Mint or the PSA equivalent
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC grading question | h2oya311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-19-2011 07:57 AM |
Another Grading Question | xdrx | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-07-2011 09:44 PM |
Question about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-30-2007 06:47 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Question about PSA grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-15-2001 09:50 AM |