![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sweet Caporal 350 back on the one I posted. I saw a few anomalies on the other cards I have; however, none were quite as distinctive. My question...both to you, and the board at large...is this: Is there any way these marks might help to reveal sheet placement of individual cards? After all, I have been on this board for a while and nobody has brought this up yet. Marks on the back are being scrutinized; however, Ted might have opened up a new avenue of exploration. Thoughts, anyone? Best Regards, Eric |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Eric,
I'm not too sure that we could use these marks to figure out a sheet layout. These marks are on all kinds of T206's,,, not just the Cobb (bat off). I think so far the best thing going to reconstruct a likely sheet is the double name cards (both same-name, and two different names) and Steve's plate scratch matching idea. Joe- Your Cobb may have that mark at the bottom center? It's kind of hard for me to tell, but with a loupe it may show. Nice cards everyone!! Sincerely, Clayton |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I've got enough scans of Magies to say there are between 6 and 8 different. With Magie probably only having been on one sheet that makes it likely that each player was on a sheet 6-8 times. What will be interesting is if the double name players have fewer uses than the others. That would mean a layout that's not balanced, so maybe 8 cards high, with some players getting an entire column, and others half or less. I'm still looking at just how to get all that into a database, and how to get enough scans that are good enough to get more detail. Steve B |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wish I had a Cobb to check
![]()
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
c'mon guys...if u want to see the really interesting printing characteristics...you need to pull out the scanning electron microscope...who's got one?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hey Pete I knew when I posted this thread, it would elicit a "cute" response from you....what took you so long ? An "electron microscope" ![]() I haven't heard that term since I was in College. And, you can guess how long ago that was ![]() ![]() Thanks for the laugh, TED Z |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Eric At this point in time, checking-out these "marks" on some of the T206's, there isn't any consistent pattern that I have seen. Therefore, I don't know what we can draw from them. Anyhow, it would be neat if some one comes up with an idea. I will continue to examine my collection of T206 cards, perhaps something here will strike me. Thanks for your serious interest in this. TED Z |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably not on mine. There are spots in the general areas where one would might expect, except they are the same tone as the Polar Bear tobacco staining. Drat!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SD and Micro SD Cards for sale | autograf | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-06-2010 08:16 AM |
Soaking cards to remove pen marks? | greenmonster66 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-23-2010 12:18 PM |
pencil marks on cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-06-2006 06:50 PM |
Pen Marks on cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-22-2005 03:05 PM |
T205 proof? probably not, but check it out... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-12-2002 10:27 PM |