![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We didnt really see a big boost in T206s at 100 years, did we? I dont see why Cracker Jack would experience anything differently.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As mentioned earlier in this thread, maybe it was a coincidence, but it's interesting to note that right about when T206 embarked on it's 100th anniversary around 2009, the E-card bubble was bursting and it seemed like a seismic shift in the hobby went heavily back toward T206 in the form of record prices for everything associated with the T206 set from "tough" commons to rarer backs to "printing errors" to "ghosts" to "freaks" etc. it's litterally exploded over the past few years since the anniversary.
Last edited by Shoele$$; 05-18-2013 at 11:55 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, you're definitely right about the new interest in ghosts, etc. Whether its 100 years or not, I have to wonder if the same interest will grow in any of the iconic sets. There's no reason it couldnt happen, though maybe not as many sets have the same printing issues as the T206. I really havent been in tune w T206 prices close enough to say either way.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
However, I don't think there will be an inordinate rise in Cracker Jack value vis a vis their anniversary. Only a guess on my part.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-18-2013 at 12:13 PM. Reason: added pic |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Man I do have a soft spot for 1914 CJs ![]() Just the fact that they're so much harder to find in good condition because of the whole kids getting them out of boxes thing, but damn I wish it wasn't so hard to put the entire set together. The images on that CJ set were so beautiful! Last edited by Shoele$$; 05-18-2013 at 12:23 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA population report shows just over 153,000 T-206s (all backs) graded (by PSA).
and just under 14,000 for 1914 and 1915 CJs combined. I know that doesn't include raw cards and other grading companies, but it should be a pretty good snapshot of the difference in the number of cards that are out there. Rarity does not always match proportionally to interest/desirability. It is about what people like. I am pretty surprised that card collecting has been so resilient during the state of our economy over the last 5 years, but that is probably OT! Thought I would follow Leon's lead and add a little color! ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gorgeous cards.
Been on a quest for two years now to find a 1914 Cobb. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I haven't heard anything about a CJ 100th anniversary but it wouldn't surprise me if they put out a new release. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB/TF Cracker Jack cards | ecRich | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-21-2013 07:06 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Adams, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Toole | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 02-01-2012 07:19 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Lord, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Neill | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2011 05:22 PM |
3 Cracker jack cards wanted 14 or 15 | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 6 | 08-13-2006 12:51 PM |
Cracker Jack Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 07-19-2004 07:27 AM |