![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
4815162342
I made a last minute change and upped for the 52 Mantle....did not want to say it here since you guys already think am I kind of crazy. The Dunlop is a great card but that specific one had sold for a little over 6200$ a few months ago (probably a real good deal for the buyer)...I was not going to spend 12 500$ on it (yes it is probably worth over 10 000$ but not to me). I told the seller....same guy that sold me the 52 Topps Mantle. Buy a card over 10 000$ and you will see your mind will play games on you as well....it is a lot of money....you have to make the right buy....EVEN if that means changing your mind a few times. I would have NOT have done so if it was 2 separate sellers. In the end it made me realize I am going to stick with baseball cards no matter what now and in the future. If I had not got the 52 Topps Mantle I would have not been happy in the end...and I am very very happy with the Mantle. I will always cherish the Mantle as part of my collection I would have not had the same felling for the Dunlop after a few months maybe (Probably) less. Last edited by Zone91; 05-08-2013 at 09:33 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would wait a bit. It's well centered, but I think you could do better for $10,000. I'm sure a nice one will show up soon enough.
T205 makes a valid point, Mick's 51 Bowman card can be had at a bargain compared to the 52 Topps. Personally I would consider both to be "rookie" cards, but as previously mentioned, the 1952 Topps image is an iconic piece of baseball history. However, if you choose 51 over 52 I suggest the 1951 Wheaties Premium photo.. It's a much nicer pic of Mantle than the 51 Bowman IMO. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
$9600 for the BVG 3.5 is not a great deal. It's not an outrageous price either, to be sure, but again it's not a bargain. For reference, a PSA 3.5 with admittedly far less eye appeal sold for around $8300, if memory serves me right. Patience is key with a card like this, which does surface. Cards that hit market very infrequently, in those cases a quick trigger and paying a premium are very understandable.
Most readily available examples of the #311 do have serious eye appeal issues such as surface loss or poor centering, thus when one with eye appeal does pop up, it can be tempting to pay a premium-- but in this case, IMO, the premium is just a tad too significant. You are in PSA 4 territory at 10K. Last edited by MattyC; 05-08-2013 at 10:02 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try and see if the dealer is willing to sell it for a lower price with a buy it now option....I have had luck with this in the past quite often when I used to collect rare coins. Do not show to much hype over the card otherwise this option is out the window.
Last edited by Zone91; 05-08-2013 at 10:11 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1956 topps mickey mantle 1960 mantle other stars from 60 to 62 | aclinton1107 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 01-16-2013 06:02 AM |
1970 topps super partial set 32/40 Mantle oddballs Post Mantle Holiday Inn PSA | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 12-02-2012 08:27 AM |
Mantle owned SGC 80 1952 Topps Mantle card | Doug | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 01-06-2012 12:29 PM |
SOLD (2) 1958 Topps Mickey Mantle AS & (1) 1961 Topps Mickey Mantle | aaroncc | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-13-2009 10:20 AM |
For Sale- Mickey Mantle cards 1957 Topps, 1960 Topps, 1963 Topps, and 1966 Topps | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 02-01-2009 12:51 AM |